padmarao
05 February 2011 at 00:48
After the complaint is filed by complainant in 138 NI Act Sworn statement was recorded by magistrate.sworn staement was impersonated and was recorded by some third party instead of complainant.PLZ let me know the consequences
Regards
JEGADEESAN
04 February 2011 at 19:45
Dear Sir/Madam,
I wish to clarify one doubt i.e.
M/s.Sri Forex Pvt Ltd was incorporated in 2002 with 2 Shareholders cum Directors Mr. X & Y .
Now Mr.X one of the shareholder cum Director wants to stop the business activity & also block the another one Director Mr. Y's power to include any other person in the company.
1.What is the way to block the business of that company?
2. Mr X one of the Director also not intend to relieve from the company?
Your immediate reply subject to Corporate Law ,will make me glad
Anonymous
04 February 2011 at 15:47
Sir,
I want to know that wether joint stuffing is permissiable in SEZ unit ??]
i.e DTA unit and SEZ unit combined stuffing in one container.?
Bhawani Mahapatra
04 February 2011 at 15:41
Dear Experts
Please explain the diffenence between Private Limited & Public Limited Company with relevent section of laws.
vikas khadria
04 February 2011 at 13:33
Sir,
can any one tell me whether we can revised the AGM filed
Anonymous
03 February 2011 at 17:28
Dear All,
Trust you are well. Recently we are going to enter into an agreement with one company. That company will provide us the advertise services for advertising our consumer goods products. Now I have inserted a clause
“The agency agrees to defend, indemnify and keep the client indemnified and harmless at all times during the tenure of the agreement from and against any and all claims, actions, proceedings, enquiries, demands, damages, assertions of liability whether civil, criminal(including any cost, expenses, loss, damages and/or consequences thereof) arising out of and pertaining to and/or resulting from any breach or non compliance by the agency of all and/or any terms and conditions of the agreement and with any law/rules/regulations which are in effect and/or any amendment thereof in course of discharge of its obligations, performance/non performance of all or any of the services as per this agreement. The effect of this clause shall survive despite the termination of this agreement.”
But my top they have convinced my top bosses that this clause are irrelevant and my bosses also want to delete it. Is it really irrelevant? Kindly advise me what are the main law by which this agreement will be surrounded. That if Information Technology Act etc. so that I can persuade them.
Shruti
03 February 2011 at 15:25
Hi everyone,
I'm posting a query for the first time in Lawyersclubindia and after pondering over this question for quite some time, I was hoping someone amongst you could help me with the following...
Now, I'm aware that a company whose shares are transferred, need not pay Stamp Duty on them. It is the transferor or the transferee who pays it (as per mutal agreement). I have also checked the Indian Stamp Act, section 29.
However my query is that, is there any section in the Companies Act, 1956 which states this? The section need not specifically mention Stamp Duty.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
138 NI
I have filed a complaint u/s 138 NI.I signed on verification also.Do I still need to file affidavit?In what way the complaint is different from Affidavit?
regards
padmarao