respected sirs,in an agreement duly signed by both the parties.
a) one party mentions the court(jurisdiction)
where any future dispute will be entertained. is this clause binding on other party or cause of action will determine where the suit is to be instituted.
b)if the agreement is signed at a particular palace,then is it necessary that the stamp paper must belong to the same state or location of the property will decide the stamp paper.
Anonymous
02 September 2011 at 13:26
do the preference shares before converting into equity shares has to be converted into ordinary shares??if yes what are the conditions
Sushil Kumar Sharma
02 September 2011 at 10:29
Dear Experts,
What is the valifity period of a Blank share transfer form from the Stamped date by ROC.
Thanks in Adv
Anonymous
02 September 2011 at 08:32
IS IT POSSIBLE THAT CREDITIAL OF X COMPANY WILL BE PURCHASED BY Y COMPANY? IF YES THEN WHAT IS THE PROCEDURE OF THIS.
In my case there are two companies,
Co. A a public co. having paid up capital of more than Rs. 1 crore
Co. b a pvt ltd co.
both A & b have common director and shareholders and Co.A wants to enter into an agreement with Co.b for giving its manufacturing work on outsource basis.
Now do Co. A need to get Central Govt prior approval under section 297 of the companies act 1956 before signing such agreement.
Anonymous
01 September 2011 at 14:25
Please suggest me that whom should i contact to seek legal opinion for discussing the case of sexual harassment and mental agony in work place.
Note that I am here talking about the other side of the coin where a female is taking advantage and falsely accusing her senior male colleague of Sexual harassment and mental agony.
Ritambhara
01 September 2011 at 11:15
whether the conversion of preference shares into equity shares in the PVt.Ltd Company has any impact on repatriation of money issues overseas under the FEMA Act
Can the experience of a shareholder be regarded as experience of the company & How??
Anonymous
31 August 2011 at 12:10
Dear Members,
I seek a legal opinion on the following.
The CC account of our client has become a NPA and the bank has taken action under sarfaesi.
The reserve price of the property has been fixed at 50 crores by the bank.
We went to HC and after arguements by both sides the court appointed a valuer.
The valuer fixed the reserve price at 100 crores.
The bank called for bidders twice in news paper ie 1st call and 2nd call.
Now the bank has approached the HC once again to review the reserve price to 50 crores.
Can you please guide me as
1. What would be the likely judgement of the court.?
2. Are there any case laws for reviewing the reserve price? like how much the court can reduce?
thanks in advance
Director of a company
can a full time director be a consultant to the same company in which he is serving as a director?