Application u/s 177 of crpc
arvind gupta
(Querist) 09 July 2013
This query is : Resolved
whether a question u/s 177 of crpc to be decided first than evidence u/s 244 of crpc?
is it appropriate to take evidence u/s 244 then hear application u/s 177?
DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g
(Expert) 10 July 2013
1) Most of criminal cases even others are fought more on tactics than law.
2) law any body can read in books but how to use it in court room for benefit of your case is the MILLION DOLLAR solution.
So if you can fine tune your problem , you can be master of criminal law.
3) Courts, opponent advocates and even contestants will oppose it and that is where lies the key.
Follow current high profile cases now LALU YADAV and also ARUSHI case now before SC and very recently NATASHA SINGH where the matter is being contested NOT on law as laid down earlier OR WHAT IS IN THE STATUE BOOKS but new interpretation / twists of its application and you will get your answers.
arvind gupta
(Querist) 10 July 2013
case is that mr. A filed complaint u/s 406 (IPC) about mr. B that he did not return STRIDHAN to him which belong to his daughter who was dead in house of mr B. Mr A file that complain in a place other than place of marriage and where he reside at the time of marriage. Mr B object that case should be filed only in the jurisdiction of city where marriage have been organised not in any other city. he file an objection u/s 177 of cr p c.
judge say that first evidence u/s 244 should be taken than mr B can raise the question u/s 177. is that right?
please give citation if you have.
