sir,
MY BROTHER EARNS AS PER HIS ITR 1.70LACS PER ANNUM.THE MM GRANTED THE LADY RS RS.8000/- PER MONTH AS MAINATAINENCE. BY WHICH SHE AGAIN APPEALED AT ADL. JUDGE FOR INCREASE AND WAS GRANTED RS.15000/- PER MONTH AS INTEREM MAINTAINENCE INCLUDING THE CHILD OF 3YRS. NOW HOW IS IT POSSIBLE THAT SHE BE GRANTED MAINTAINENCE MORE THAN WHAT MY BROTHER EARNS. PLS. ADVISE WHAT SHOULD WE DO AS SHE HAS PUT AT LEAST 10 CASES AGAINST HIM. HE IS NOT ABLE TO ATTEND WORK REGULARLY AND ALSO BECAUSE OF THESE TENSIONS HE IS DETECTED WITH BP & SUGAR.
FROM WHER HE WILL BRING THE MONEY MORE THAN HIS CAPACITY TO EARN & IF ALL IS GIVEN TO HER THEN WHERE WILL HE FEED HIMSELF.
TIS IS REAL CRUELTY. PLS. ADVISE.
THANKS
NEERAJ GUPTA
Sir I want to submit a case in which there are two sets of accused i.e. ABC & DEFG ,there is a eye witness in this case he is saying that real murderer are AB &C but police found in their investigation that real murderer are D,E,F, & G. Police also recovered weapon used in the murder at the instance of accused D,E,F, & G.Weapon Revolver was sent to FSL for expert opinion.Ballistic expert opined that this revolver was used in the present murder case because bullets which were removed (Taken Out) from the body of dceased and test fired bullets are fired from the same revolver.police discharged the accused AB & C and chargesheeted accused D,E,F, & G.but later on eye witness appear in the court and stated that real murderer are AB & C and D,E,F, & G.are not murderer,resultly AB &C summoned by the court us 319 crpc & now position is that two sets of accused are before the court one is AB &C & another is D,E,F, & G. Eyewitness is saying that real murderer is AB &C but FSL (Expert)report says real murderer is Accused D,E,F,& G.which version is acceptable.
whether blanck cheque attract prosecution? if no plz give some judgement
Several high courts in india had ordered to perform narco analysis of accuse however all the orders are stayed by hon"ble apex court. Now in this cercumstanes what would have been position of the trail court to deceid the question of narco analysis
i got a case in which a student committed suicide leaving behind a note in which he accussed two of his friends for mantal harrassment which compelled him to do that act.
is there any hope of saving them?
what evidences can be used in their favour?
Sir
some relatives (maternal grandmother, maternal uncle of daughter of the defactocomplainant) entered into the house of defactocomplainant with an intention to see their grand daughter, who is the daughter of the defacto complainant, but the defacto complainant refused them to see her. Then they pushed them inorder to see her. Subsequently the defacto complainant filed a complaint for house trespass.
Whether criminal trespass maintainable on the accused?
Whether any citations on this aspect, if available kindly mail me sirs at an earliest.
Essential Commodities Act-sec.6,3-Bar as to jurisdiction or court-Seizure of salt-Release of-F.I.R. NOT DISCLOSING that salt was seized in contravention of order issued underS.3of Act-Court can release salt ?
i belong to maharashtra iwant name and address of handwriting expart at mumbai or pune
i belong to maharashtra iwant name and address of handwriting expart at mumbai or pune
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT (SECTION 138)
Sir,
I am a wholesale paddy trader from Gondia,Maharashtra.
A person who bought 5 truck of paddy from me has given me a cheque of Rs 5lacs.
But it is dishonoured by his banker with reason "the payment is stopped by the drawer".I sent him a notice through my lawer.He replied that the cheque was missed and he has also done a FIR in the police station.Now what is the way to recover my money.Please suggest me.