LCI Learning
New LIVE Course: Toxicology and Law. Batch begins 21st July. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Adv. Deepak   14 June 2009 at 00:27

Evidence Act Section 65B.

My problem is if I record conversation on my mobile and make a CD of the recording, can such CD be produced in evidence in Criminal Court. Will it be admissible considering the provisions of Section 65B of Evidence Act. Please educate me in detail. Regards. Deepak

Adv. Deepak   13 June 2009 at 11:10

Mobile Conversation as evidence in Criminal Court.

Dear Experts, I want to know how a conversation recorded on mobile can be produced as evidence in Domestic Violence Case in Criminal Court. Whether the mobile service providers give the recorded versions of conversation with authentic certificate? How it can be obtained, if it is possible? What is the procedure for obtaining such records from the service providers? Kindly educate me in this matter. My email is ddkharpudikar@indiatimes.com. Regards. Deepak.

Legal Fighter   13 June 2009 at 10:29

Need a copy of Calcutta HC Judgment

I need a copy of the below judgment at the earliest. Can anyone pls help me getting a copy of the same. I am also ready to pay the required charges incurred in getting the same.

Shipra Raj Ray versus State of West Bengal.

It has been reported in Calcutta Criminal law reporter, 2007, Vol - 1, page no. 800.

Ranganath   12 June 2009 at 19:28

Role of public prosecutor

Ld counsels,

What is the role of public prosecutor while appearing for an anticipatory bail hearing. Once the bail is ordered is it valid or legal for the PP to say that he had failed to notice the allegations in the complaint and had reported only the part of the offenses made out in the complaint to the court during the hearing.

How will such a failure be treated by the court at a later point. The point here is that the bail was pryed fearing arrest based on dowry complaint and the prosecutor confirmed that it is a case of dowry demand. But later the complaint copy was altered by police with allegations of cheating which was not repoted by the PP during the hearing.

Please clarify. Thanks

vinod bansal   10 June 2009 at 19:40

custodial death

R/Members
police obtained two days police remand of a accused from the court & during remand in police custody accused died due to injuries/torture caused by police,which sections of IPC are applicable in this case. Thanks

RATAN K. GUPTA   10 June 2009 at 11:59

List of famous criminal Lawyers of Hyderabad

I want to know address and phone nos/cell nos of some famous lawyers of Hyderabad who are practising in A.P.High court and Magistrates courts on urgent basis

Ladhu Ram Chowdhary   09 June 2009 at 18:14

Alter or Add to charge

magistrate Alter or Add to charge in summons-case u/s sec. 251 cr.p.c.! send me sc case law.

Anil   08 June 2009 at 16:31

Section 494 & 498 of crpc

my first wife has filed case of 494 & 498 of crpc act and i out for bail, case is going on in the couurt.Am i elegible for 2nd marriage if divorce case is not filed and case result is not yet given. please suggest.

sampat singh   08 June 2009 at 16:05

IPC SECTION 354 & 451

Procutrix says I was sleeping in my room with open door & my mother was also sleeping in other room with open door. the Accused come with his brother in law (SAALA)at night at 2'o clock. he swith on the light & caught hold my palm(Hand). the Saala was stand out side of my room.then I shouted the Accuesed and his saala run away.
plz tell me IPC sec. 354 & 451 are committed here or not? A lawyser tell me Ipc section 451 is not commited here Because IPC sec 451 are belong to where the accused enterd in the open place.there are no roof on the wall like chowk.is it true? if IPC sec 451 is not effected here when which section effected here? tell me also what defence should taken by accused? I want to send you this case history

M.S.Chandra Shekar   08 June 2009 at 12:19

Application u/s 340 CrPC in Civil Suit

I hava prima facie evidence against the Registration Department false deposition on a Exhibit in a Suit for Partition (Civil Dispute) in which I am the Defendant and the suit was decreed against me due to the False evidence given by the Registration Department.

After 20 years I got a prima facie evidence when the Registration Department failed to contest the same exhibit in the Hon'ble High Court, the order of the High court was given in my favour

Now I have moved a 340 CrPc Petition in the Civil Court where the Suit was decreed against me.

Now my question is that whether I have to obtain a permission from the state government to prosecute the Sub Registrar / District Registrar against whom the Petition is made ? / or the 340 Cr Pc application will be sufficient?

Please help.