PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
30 July 2009 at 23:00
hello all learned experts
i have handled many cases of the theft and got to my client equittal on the base of the identification parade and generally such types cases where any mudamal valuables gets from the suspious and after interrogation of police it is disclosed the goods of theft and then police inform the victim and victim become the complaiant now in the same case i can aquittal to the accussed but the ssection 103 of evidance act presumption is lies so what i have to do for the escape from the said section also provid judgement without the identification parade conviction can not be placed thanks
Ranganath
30 July 2009 at 14:18
Ld counsels,
This is about framing of additional charges by the magistrate. It appears that framing of additional charges (over and above what is mentioned in FIR) is very subjective on the ground that there is strong suspicion of commission of offense.
Can the court rope in new accused into the case if some offense is revealed in the statements u/s 161 wile framing charges.
When new charges are added can that be revised by a higher court.
Please clarify
Thanks
baljit singh
30 July 2009 at 12:15
Hi,
i am advocate baljit practising at district courts amritsar. my querry is whether during the pendendy of procalamation proceedings against he accused, he has any right to challenge them without surrendering before the court concerned.
if yes quote any case law.
ravinder
28 July 2009 at 22:09
If a person takes benifit of sec 12 probation act then will it effect the mact and consumer cases.
vinod bansal
27 July 2009 at 22:01
All respected members
is it mandatory to record the preliminary evidence by magistrate himself in his hand writing? Kindly provide any case law or provision in this regard, Thanx
TRIBHUVAN PUROHIT
27 July 2009 at 15:45
As stated in subject, please let me know about complete details of powers u/s 319 & 482 specially mentioning when & where these sections are used.
Awaiting reply.
Thanking you,
TRIBHUVAN PUROHIT
ad. creaminall
27 July 2009 at 15:43
on behalf of Accused >>> a criminal complaint filed against the accused and charge framed for abetment, fraud, forgery, cheating etc. after more than 3 years pp. filed an application for alteration of charge framed against the accused. court has reframe charged. can amagistrate has a power to reframe the charge of the application of alteration the charge? or can a magistrate has a power to reframe the charge with or without anay application?
Vishal jain
27 July 2009 at 11:54
Hello,
I am having a matrimonial dispute with my in-laws as I have been pushed in a false 498a case.
Now, From reliable sources I came to know that all the phones(land line & mobile) they are using, has been on fake IDs, means they are using those phones having fake IDs.
Please help me as to what judicial/non-judicial action(s) can be taken against them and how ?? so that they can be f***ed as I want to forward one complaint to the local police station under the Subject
Subject: (To Register a F.I.R regarding cheating with law and the society, giving wrong & projected information(fake IDs) under Sections 420/419/467/468/471/417/34 of IPC and also teligraph act.)
Please let me know the format to write the complaint. And the contents to include in the complaint.
I will be obliged if you can make a rough draft for me in a legal manner, as to what should I write in the complaint(point wise) as I am not in position to hire an advocate
From
Vijay
09899667936
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
which action will better
sir,
in 3/7 e.c.act the district magistrate passd an order(that the application which is filed by the respondent is fake so why any action not be taken against him ) during the pendency of prociding of confiscation .
what is the procedure to chellange that order?
and in which act the application will be given?