AJIT KAWATKAR
10 April 2011 at 20:20
The matter is in maharashtra.
A ownership flat belonging to Sr.Citizen-Spinster,in her absence, is taken over by a family some 3 yrs back[no docoments, so trsspasser]the occupier applied for some govt,wefare scheme where in she submitted FORGED LL AGRMNT to the agency[nationalised bank]the copy of that eas sent to the owner by bank about a yr back.We requested the occupier through mediator, to hand over the possession without making known to her about the COPY of FORGED DOBUMENT,But without success.
Since much time has passed,kindly let me know whether we can file Forgery & Tress-passing complaints/suit ? what will be expected success ?
Shirazk
10 April 2011 at 12:36
Our Society Committee members were dismissed by the Deputy Registrar for not filing their indemnity bonds, over a period of time we found out through the society bank account that they had also removed money around 20 lacs under fictitious categories with false vouchers. Now, out of the 5 bldgs that we have, 3 have decided to go in for bifurcation & the proposal was forwarded to the deputy registrar & he put up a notice under section 18 fvor bifurcation. Now the ex committee secretary has gone to the Jt registrar & managed to get a stay against bifurcation proceedings ( instead of approaching the deputy registrar . He has used members who are for bifurcation forging them & showing the Jt Registrar that they are against bifurcation. These signatures were in the society office & were given for some other purpose by the members, some of the signatures even ahve dates on them which are a year old.
Now, when we approached the local police station asking them to file a case against the ex secretary, they are not ready to do so & are asking us to approach the court to ask them to direct the police to initiate an inquiry against him. The police are also telling us that they cannot do any sort of inquiry against him cause he has used our signatures & there is no financials involved so they cannot initiate any sort of inquiry against him.
Kindly let us know what can we do against the ex secretary for using our signatures fraudently & if we can under what law, sections etc ? Over 50 people have signed the letter to the police station & given it to them.
prsmitra
10 April 2011 at 11:33
plz verify the written arguments and give best decision for submit into the court on or before 18-04=2011
Anantha Sowrya
06 April 2011 at 23:57
In the 498a case as here under:
Original Jurisdicition[marriage & last residing]
Wrong Juridscition[case filed and parental home of women]
In the above pare what is the procedure when the first IO[actual] deputes second IO[SHO] for verification at original jurisdcition
Any orders/memos should given to second IO
by the first IO itself, if so, first IO has the powers himself to do so?
OR
Any orders/memos should be taken from the magistrate for by the first IO to depute a second IO for verification in original jurisdiciton.
Can anyone answer with your replies
Note:Question raised such that, the same[deputation] was written in the charge sheet.
vsreddy
06 April 2011 at 22:29
can a family court or a immigration desk at Airport are empowered to seize or impound :
a. passport of an Indian Citizen
b.Passport of a foreign citizen (PIO)
Passport act says that other than passport officer others don't have the powers but there are hearsay and rumours that central govt. have issued a G.O. empowering the family courts.
can I be enlightened on this?
Gagan Souri
31 March 2011 at 22:15
Hello Friends,
A.P. Govt made 498a, a compoundable offence, if no dowry added to it.
i have only 498a on me no DP3 or DP4 but, complainant claimed dowry in the 498a.
Doubts/Questions:
1)Now my 498a, is compoundable is or
non-compoundable.
2)Does police have to take permission/orders from DCP/ACP to visit the accused house and ask him to come to the POLICE STATION.
Ketan Modi
30 March 2011 at 12:41
I am looking for the order of Bombay High Court in case of Shiv Sena's former MLA Sitaram Dalvi who had damaged property at a Hotel in Mumbai during one of the Sena style protest. Dalvi was directed to pay compensation to the tune of Rs.5 lakh. This is a landmark judgment copy of which is not available despite looking for it. Can some expert oblige?
Ketan Modi
mayank srivastava
28 March 2011 at 20:28
I used to take connection from Mr. Balbir Singh (Sales Executive) his mobile number is 9335076216.
one day i decided to surrender my one of postpaid number so i contacted reliance customer care, their executive told me that i have to submit written application to reliance. so i contacted Mr. Balbir, then after that i submitted my application n sim to Balbir after getting assurance from his side that he ll do further steps to surrender.
But Unfortunately he fooled me and he sold that sim to one of his other customer after taking some money coz the plan on my number was special SRP200. after few months i asked Balbir about that then he told me that he has not surendered the connection but he transfered the connection to another customer and he ll do the formal procedure for transfer of ownership.
My Fault was that i believed on him on good faith and i also surrendered my sim to him. After few months he resigned from Reliance and joined somewhere else and at the same time i got notice from reliance that my bill is due at around Rs. 1200 and i have to pay the same otherwise some legal actions may be taken against me.
So after this i called Balbir again and he suggested me to ignore the notice but i refused his suggestion and i asked him to give me the details of that customer and i shouted on him that u should pay this outstanding as i m not responsible for that. He said ok that he ll pay.But after that he is not picking my calls
But 3 days back i got a call from a lady from delhi and she told me that she is an advocate and i have to pay the bill now before 5 PM else she register a legal case against me.
I m so much worried now and i want resolution. Kindly help me. why should i pay Rs. 1200 as i have not used the connection thats why i have registered my complain in consumer court also and here for some help.
Today i got a call from relaince and the lady asked me all the details and she has no resolution about the problem rather she was blaiming me that it was my fault.
She asked me bout the proof of that request but i m not able to give proof as i believed on him on good faith that he ll do all the formalities and i had not taken any written proof or receiving of my application from him.
I told her that i can lodge a FIR against Mr. Balbir and i can submit that copy in relaince from my behalf so they believe that my case was genuine and it would work as a proof but she told me that it wouldn't work.
So i need some urgent help and resolution from you experts.
Waiting for some early n needful response
Thanks & Regards
Mayank Srivastava
Surrendred No. 9335287827
Ph. No. 9335363533
Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate
27 March 2011 at 20:39
What are the releted questions (general questions)by both side(difence & prosicution) when we are disclosing the witness as hostile!
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
"not negotiable"
NI Act, 1881
Section 125 Crossing After Issue :
Where a cheque is uncrossed, the holder may cross it generally or specially.
Where a cheque is crossed generally, the holder may cross it specially.
Where a cheque is crossed generally or specially, the holder may add the words "not negotiable".
Where a cheque is crossed specially, the banker to whom it is crossed may again cross it specially to another banker, his agent, for collection.
Question :
1) Where a cheque is crossed generally, the holder may cross it specially. (so vive - versa is not applicable (means if the cheque crossed is crossed specially, the holder cannot cross generally)) right ?
2) Where a cheque is crossed generally or specially, the holder may add the words "not negotiable".
It means that when the word "not negotiable" is written on the cheque than the cheque cannot be further endorsed to anybody else right ? Eg: a/c payee "not negotiable" to jyoti than jyoti cannot endorsed to anybody else & if the cheque is lost than bank cannot deposited the cheque which contains the word "not negotiable" to the other a/c if the cheque is lost ?
3) Where a cheque is crossed specially, the banker to whom it is crossed may again cross it specially to another banker, his agent, for collection.
but if the word "not negotiable" is written than banker can also can't endorsed to any another person or banker. right ?
Thanks.