Exclusive HOLI Discounts!
Get Courses and Combos at Upto 50% OFF!
Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

shamina sayed (Advocate)     14 January 2010

whether consent of huband required for terminating pregnency

dear advocates,

one  married lady aged eighteen yrs  aborted three months pregnancy and this was done with out the consent of her husband.the reason is that she does not want to go back with her husband.the case is of torture and beatings after he turns up in drunk condition every day.

now want to initiate the complaint against the husband.

my querry is whether the consent of husband is required in this case?if yes pls give the reply along with the section.

Thanking you



Learning

 22 Replies

Arup Kumar Gupta, Korba, Chattishgarh ((m)9893058429)     14 January 2010

here is the act. please go through it.

THE MEDICAL TERMINAITON OF PREGNANCY ACT

No. 34 OF 1971

10th August 1971

An Act to provide for the termination of certain pregnancies by registered medical

practitioners and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto

 

 

A V Vishal (Advocate)     14 January 2010

A woman's act of undergoing abortion to terminate a pregnancy without the consent of her spouse amounts to mental cruelty and her husband is entitled to seek divorce on this ground, the Supreme Court has ruled in an important ruling.
 

Further under The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act , the conditions for abortion are:-

(i) Where a pregnant woman has a serious medical disease and continuation of pregnancy could endanger her life like:

  • Heart diseases.
  • Severe rise in blood pressure.
  • Uncontrolled vomiting during pregnancy
  • Cervical/ breast cancer.
  • Diabetes mellitus with eye complication (retinopathy).
  • Epilepsy.
  • Psychiatric illness.

(ii) Where the continuation of pregnancy could lead to substantial risk to the newborn leading to serious physical / mental handicaps examples like

  • Chromosomal abnormalities.
  • Rubella (German measles) viral infection to mother in first three months.
  • If previous children have congenital abnormalities.
  • Rh iso-immunisation. 
  • Exposure of the foetus to irradiation.

(iii) Pregnancy resulting of rape.

(iv) Conditions where the socio-economic status of the mother (family) hampers the progress of a healthy pregnancy and the birth of a healthy child.

Failure of Contraceptive Device irrespective of the method used (natural methods/ barrier methods/ hormonal methods).

This condition is a unique feature of the Indian Law. All the pregnancies can be terminated using this criterion.

If your client fits in the above conditions then

If married--- her own written consent. Husband’s consent not required.
If unmarried and above 18years ---her own written consent.
If below 18 years ---written consent of her guardian.
If mentally unstable --- written consent of her guardian.
A consent assures the clinician performing the abortion that she:
Has been informed of all her options.
Has been counseled about the procedure, its risks and how to care for herself after she chosen the abortion of her own free will.
 

1 Like

Arup Kumar Gupta, Korba, Chattishgarh ((m)9893058429)     15 January 2010

THE MEDICAL TERMINATION OF PREGNANCY ACT, 1971 ACT NO. 34 OF 1971 [10th August, 1971.] An Act to provide for the termination of certain pregnancies by registered medical practitioners and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Twenty-second Year of the Republic of India as follows:- 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 1.Short title, extent and commencement.(1) This Act may be called the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971. (2) It extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir. (3) It shall come into force on such, date 1 as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint. 2. Definitions. 2.Definitions. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,- (a) "guardian" means a person having the care of the person of a minor or a lunatic ; (b) "lunatic" has the meaning assigned to it in section 3 of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912; (4 of 1912) (c) "minor" means a person who, under the provisions of the Indian Majority Act, 1875 (9 of 1875) is to be deemed not to have attained his majority; (d) "registered medical practitioner" means a medical practitioner who possesses any recognised medical qualification as defined in clause (h) of section 2 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, (102 of 1956) whose name has been entered in a State Medical Register and who has such experience or training in gynaecology and obstetrics as may be prescribed by rules made under this Act. 3. When pregnancies may be terminated by registered medicalpractitioners. 3.When pregnancies may be terminated by registered medical practitioners.(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Indian Penal Code, (45 of 1860) a registered medical practitioner shall not be guilty of any offence under that Code or under any other law for the time being in force, if any pregnancy is terminated by him in accordance with the provisions of this Act. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1st April 1972, vide Notification No. GSR 2857, dated 19-2- 1972, see Gazette of India, Part II, Sec. 3 (i), p. 708. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 172 (2) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (4), a pregnancy may be terminated by a registered medical practitioner,- (a) where the length of the pregnancy does not exceed twelve weeks, if such medical practitioner is, or (b) where the length of the pregnancy exceeds twelve weeks but does not exceed twenty weeks, if not less than two registerd medical practitioners are of opinion, formed in good faith, that- (i) the continuance of the pregnancy would involve a risk to the life of the pregnant woman or of grave injury to her physical or mental health; or (ii) there is a substantial risk that if the child were born, it would suffer from such physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicapped. Explanation I.-Where any pregnancy is alleged by the pregnant woman to have been caused by rape, the angwish caused by such pregnancy shall be presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman. Explanation II.-Where any pregnancy occurs as a result of failure of any device or method used by any married woman or her husband for the purpose of limiting the number of children, the anguish caused by such unwanted pregnancy may be presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman. (3) In determining whether the continuance of a pregnancy would involve such risk of injury to the health as is mentioned in sub- section (2), account may be taken of the pregnant woman's actual or reasonably foreseeable environment. (4) (a) No pregnancy of a woman, who has not attained the age of eighteen years, or, who, having attained the age of eighteen years, is a lunatic, shall be terminated except with the consent in writing of her guardian. (b) Save as otherwise provided in clause (a), no pregnancy shall be terminated except with the consent of the pregnant woman. 4. Place where pregnancy may be terminated. 4.Place where pregnancy may be terminated.No termination of pregnancy shall be made in accordance with this Act at any place other than- (a) a hospital established or maintained by Government, or (b) a place for the time being approved for the purpose of this Act by Government. 173 5. Sections 3 and 4 When not to apply. 5.Sections 3 and 4 When not to apply.(1) The provisions of section 4, and so much of the provision of sub-section (2) of section 3 as relate to the length of the pregnancy and the opinion of not less than two registered medical practitioners, shall not apply to the termination of a pregnancy by a registered medical practitioner in a case where he is of opinion, formed in good faith, that the termination of such pregnancy is immediately necessary to save the life of the pregnant woman. (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Indian Penal Code, (45 of 1860) the termination of a pregnancy by a person who is not a registered medical practitioner shall be an offence punishable under that Code, and that Code shall, to this extent, stand modified. Explanation.-For the purposes of this section, so much of the provisions of clause (d) of section 2 as relate to the possession, by a registered medical practitioner, of experience or training in gynaecology and obstetrics shall not apply. 6. Power to make rules. 6.Power to make rules.(1) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make rules to carry out the provisions of this Act. (2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such rules may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:- (a) the experience or training, or both, which a registered medical practitioner shall have if he intends to terminate any pregnancy under this Act ; and (b) such other matters as are required to be or may be provided by rules made under this Act. (3) Every rule made by the Central Government under this Act shall be laid, as soon as may be after it is made, before each House of Parliament while it is in session for a total period of thirty days which may be comprised in one session or in two successive sessions, and if, before the expiry of the session in which it is so laid or the session immediately following, both Houses agree in making any modification in the rule or both Houses agree that the rule should not be made, the rule shall thereafter have effect only in such modified form or be of no effect, as the case may be ; so, however, that any such modification or annulment shall be without prejudice to the validity of anything previously done under that rule. 7. Power to make regulations. 7.Power to make regulations.(1) The State Government may, by regulations,- (a) require any such opinion as is referred to in sub- section (2) of section 3 to be certified by a registered medical 174 practitioner or practitioners concerned, in such form and at such time as may be specified in such regulations, and the preservation or disposal of such certificates; (b) require any registered medical practitioner, who terminates a pregnancy, to give intimation of such termina- as may be specified in such regulations ; (c) prohibit the disclosure, except to such persons and for such purposes as may be specified in such regulations, of intimations given or information furnished in pursuance of such regulations. (2) The intimation given and the information furnished in pur- suance of regulations made by virtue of clause (b) of sub-section (1) shall be given or furnished, as the case may be, to the Chief Medical Officer of the State. (3) Any person who wilfully contravenes or wilfully fails to comply with the requirements of any regulation made under sub-section (1) shall be liable to be punished with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees. 8. Protection of action taken in good faith. 8.Protection of action taken in good faith.No suit or other legal proceeding shall lie against any registered medical practitioner for any damage caused or likely to be caused by anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done under this Act.

Hardik Mehta (Family Counsellor)     15 January 2010

In addition to the divorce, the husband can also file the case u/s 312 of IPC and send the women for 10 years of jail for terminating the pregnancy without any permission. In short she has killed the child.

K.C.Suresh (Advocate)     15 January 2010

Hallo AKG, Thanks for the text. Arun Kumar Gupata in short AKG. A great politician of Kerala whose name is in the early pages of SC in Due process case by Costitutional bench. So I caall you AKG. KC

Arup Kumar Gupta, Korba, Chattishgarh ((m)9893058429)     15 January 2010

Thank you sir. with pleasure. will you kindly hints somethingh about due process case?

Arup Kumar Gupta, Korba, Chattishgarh ((m)9893058429)     15 January 2010

mr suresh, i understood. he was mr a.k.gopalon - prominant political leader. the case was on personal liberty - a famous case.


(Guest)
Agreed with Vashal ji and Hardik Mehta ji.

Victim_Kol (Middle Executive)     14 February 2010

But what about the point of putting the blame of torture upon her husband ? As I am facing a similar type of charge myself.

Wife as undergone MTP in presence of her father, and put the blame upon me that I have physically tortured her for which  she had to do so.

Arup Kumar Gupta, Korba, Chattishgarh ((m)9893058429)     14 February 2010

Mr. Victim Kolkata, who is the witness and where is the medical report and police report? if any please check the date and place. might be a false report.

generally, women do it, to keep the future secured. a woman having child is less demand on the field of marriage.

 

Victim_Kol (Middle Executive)     15 February 2010

What Police Report U are talking about, Mr. Gupta ?

Arup Kumar Gupta, Korba, Chattishgarh ((m)9893058429)     15 February 2010

mr victim, suppose you beaten her. then it is quite natural that she will report it to police. if there is no report or a report with long delay, - it indicates that such things not happened, that's why either they not reported or reported with a long delay. this question will come at the time of her witness - if any. 

Victim_Kol (Middle Executive)     15 February 2010

Oh. In that regard I can say that there is no police reporting done, before the MTP. Atleast the husband has not been summoned by any Police Officials.

The FIR stating that the husband has caused the injury to go for MTP, has been lodged a month after the MTP has been done.

Arup Kumar Gupta, Korba, Chattishgarh ((m)9893058429)     15 February 2010

quite natural because it is a got up case. now i am reading your case.

facing problem to post the  replies copied from my computer.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register