Respected lady,
might be you are not getting justice but its better not to use any bad comments for unknown person,(Martin Sujoy). every one here is giving time to help you. might be his words at present not suitable to you, so you can ignore it.
as far as your case is concerned , i have already given you a high court order, if lines like below is mentioned in your order ,you have then liberty to restore the case and again start a new life of going court and feeding money to laywer.
if your lawyer missed below point then its very difficult to restore case. so read,read and again read your case order ,
Since your hubby is defaulter , so my guess is that court order allowed him to default because of mistake by your lawyer or you. Its my guess , so please do not say any bad words to me ( just joking ).....
I hope you got my point....
please do not mind I have one suggestion .. do not loose temper and say anything to helper. its upto you how you take.
if any mistake from me then kindly ignore/forgive in advance for replying your query. :)
respondent no.2 shall have the liberty to restore
the complaint under Section 12 of the D.V. Act against him and his family members and other proceedings as per the provisions of law and the amount received by the respondent no.2 shall be forfeited and that ABC shall not claim the said amount from respondent
Same will apply to you if you defaulted. out of court settlement or deed will not work if it is not mentioned in court order. only you can fight for agreement again. so better incorporate your aggrement in court order