In hma 13(1)(i-a): is respondent req'd to 1) give evidence affidavit and 2) be cross-examined?

In the divorce case, whatevr the circumstances be, respondent in a legal case can decline to give evidence, but this refusal can have significant negative consequences. 

While they are not legally compelled to testify in their own defense (unless specifically ordered by the court, like in the case of a subpoena), not offering their testimony can create a negative inference against them, impacting the court's assessment of their case. 

Not testifying can negatively impact the perceived credibility of their case. The court might see it as a lack of confidence in their own claims.

Sometimes, a respondent might choose not to testify based on strategic legal considerations, such as avoiding cross-examination or not wanting to expose weaknesses in their case. 

However, the potential negative consequences must be carefully weighed.

Thank you T. Kalaiselvan Sir for the prompt response.

It seems to me that u/s 315(1) CrPC, no adverse inference can be drawn against an accused for choosing not to give evidence. However, as per your response, I could find no such provision in CPC. Hence, generally speaking, it seems unwise for Respondents to choose not to testify.

The section 315 cr.p.c. is criminal law whereas you are seeking clarification under civil law.

Therefore you may decide accordingly on all such further issues.