Thank you respectable advocates for your time and your opinion.
Police in this case has almost forcibly prolonged the case for almost 10 years. They had no case and were lying from the very beginning. The main complainant (SI of Police), the only witnesses who all but one are also police personnel and the IO of the case who is Police as well has cooked up this case to help a relative of mine to put pressure on me for tangible benefits in certain parental properties.
Without going into the lengthy technical details of the case, I'll briefly say that in cooking up the story for this case, the police has made a lot of glaring mistakes/inaccuracies in their statements both in the initial chargesheet and under oath in court, and these can easily be proved in court by me.
From what I understand from the learned advocates I should be exonerated first in this case and then make a case against the police. The police then can make an appeal in the higher court against the verdict in this trial court to prolong my tenure as accused. They don't have any monetary expenses for pursuing these cases so they are enjoying themselves at the exchequer's expense and can afford to prolong a case as much as they can.
Also my main grounds against the Police would be:
a) Perjury/lying under oath, as well as by all people involved in the case in the charge sheet.
b) Criminal conspiracy of police with a relative of mine.
c) Attempting to enter my room at midnight without a warrant and just because this other relative has called the police.
d) Assault by police both in transit to police station and while in Police Station (Difficult to prove this).
e) Spoiling my life for ten long years and many lost opportunities as well as other monetary losses.
f) Snatching away my Nokia mobile phone in the police station and not including it in the seizure list and so stealing it. (Difficult to prove this as I never got it back)
g) Other procedural lapses by police.
h) The Public Prosecutor himself is trying to mislead the law by pointing to accused indirectly i.e. by turning his face towards the accused and nodding and helping witness identify the accused when witness is saying that he cannot identify.
i) The plain clothes police person who helps in maintaining order in court is also trying to help his fellow police brethren by pointing at accused and asking accused to "stand straight" just when PP is asking witness to identify accused.
e) Any other ground that anybody can think of as per the stated facts?
But as per the advice of Dr. G.Balakrishnan, police can use their power given to protect the people, to terrorize me instead. So, I am confused whether I should let go of these people and whimper the rest of my life or take action against them anyway. If I do decide to proceed with a countercase against the police, should I take any other extra precautions such as any anticipatory bail against police trying to involve me in any other false case as revenge? Or any other similar steps?
Your valuable advice might help me shield against the men in uniform who are frequently on the wrong side of the law these days.