"A son "purchased his father "property B" in 2005 from his father's landlord. Now can both father and son interfere in the "property of C (a bathroom)" claiming that they are still tenant of a bathroom in "property C" (which they had while they were tenant, but now they purchased the property, and not that bathroom)? Both son and father still have possession in that bathroom (which is in property C") and they are not leaving it. Father is claiming that he is still tenant (only property transferred not his tenancy).. and also he is taking the advantage of an ex-parte decree passed in his favor where party in "property C" were restrained to "not to raise a boundary wall in front of bathroom".
Party in "property C" now as tempoary injunction order wherby those son and father cannot interfere in the "property of C," but both son and father are still using that bathroom, claiming they are still tenant of that bathroom and still they have decree in their favor to use this bathroom.
So, what is the remedy for the party in "property C". How can property of C be protected from both father and son (who are claiming them to be tenant )?
