As par fir detail, complaintat lodge his complaint describing that agriculture officer has demand for money for his granting subcidy. And Agri officer reached him twice to demand money. After fixing time ,date, place to hand over money to respondent he lodge comp. He also add that at pre fixing time table respondent appeal him to if respon. may not come at the scheduled time due to official matter Mr.xyz will come there and handover money to them.
ACB police arreange trap and at the place caught third party public person with receive ing money in presence of govt. Witness PW.1 from comp.where mr.xyz was present.
Police charjed aginst agri.offi., mr.xyz.and third party under sanction 7,12, 13/1 of prevention of curruption act.
At trial court procicution present govt.witness P.W. 1 and others including Po.officer . P.W.1 stated before hon.court that mr.xyz was not presence himself at trap place but comp.lead him at place from outside state highway. He also added that mr. Xyz had not demanded money or receiving money from comp. Complaintat himself hand over money to public person. He was hostile.
Procicution had not present any other eye witness which presence was there or any other documents to prove demand and recovery from mr.xyz. hon.trial court convicted all three under section of p.act. my queary is : when demand is not prove by any meterial evidence or jubani, on which ground hon. court convicted the acused ?
How many chances are there to eqital at highcourt.