LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

socially backward (Social worker)     25 January 2014

On s65/66 ita 2000

the owner of a business concern lodged FIR against a known person u/s 65/66 of ITA 2000 alleging that person had hacked/used the email id of the concern to send objectionable mails to some other authorities.The alleged person is officially nobody to the said concern,still the concerned used his mobile no to open email id without his knowledge.

Now what the known person can do to save himself legally?

kindly reply.very urgent.


 2 Replies

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate)     25 January 2014

The person who has been accused to have hacked mail/account on summoning for inquiry by anti cyber crime police has to express his position with available  details and has to authenticate his stand by proving his intentions etc.

socially backward (Social worker)     26 January 2014

one amendment to my previous query,

the charge was brought u/s 66a n 66c of ITA 2000.From the papers of complaint it is clear that the charge is false.Now what should the person do as he is a govt employee .these sections of RTA 2000 are bailable or non-bailable ?the complaint was lodged in local police station of the business concern.

kindly reply.urgent.

Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Popular Discussion

view more »

Post a Suggestion for LCI Team
Post a Legal Query