25% OFF on all LCI Courses. Offer valid till 5th Oct. Use Code: DUS25
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

manu (advocate)     21 October 2009

medical negligence and consumer protection

sirs,

pls furnish citations if any on this point- doctor who negligently left operation instrument in the body of patient is liable to pay compensation. and leaving operation instrument in the body of patient after surgery is the negligence attributable to doctor alone.

thanks



Learning

 9 Replies

Karl Jacob (Partner/Advocate)     21 October 2009

Here is a decided case.


Attached File : 27 27 mrs shanta vs state of andhra pradesh and ors on 11 february 1997.pdf downloaded: 252 times

AEJAZ AHMED (Legal Consultant/Lawyer)     21 October 2009

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1917076/

ACHUTRAO HARIBHAU KHODWA
Vs.
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
 
Decided on: 20/02/1996
 
"  Observation & Order:
 
The appellants are aggrieved by the judgment of the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court which has reversed a decree for Rs.36,000/− passed by the Civil Judge, Second Division, Aurangabad, as damages on account of the death of one Chandrikabai who was the wife of appellant no.1 and the mother of appellant nos. 2 to 5, after she had undergone a sterilization operation at the Civil Hospital, Aurangabad.
 
According to the appellants, respondent nos. 2 and 3 assisted Dr. Divan in this Operation. Dr. Divan, as a result of the second operation, found that a mop (towel) had been left inside the body of Chandrikabai when sterilization operation was performed on her.
 
In our opinion, therefore, the High Court clearly fell in error in reversing the judgment of the trial court and in dismissing the appellants’ suit. For the aforesaid reasons, this appeal is allowed, the judgment of the High Court of Bombay under appeal is set aside and the judgment and decree of the trial court is restored. The appellants will also be entitled to costs throughout.
 
S. Thamil Selvi
Vs.
Dr. Sooriya Kala And anr
Decided on 7/3/2007
" Observation & Order:
 
57. In the head notes of the oft cited case decided by the Supreme Court of India, Achutrao Haribhau Khodwa and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors. , it is stated that:-
 
In this case Tort− Medical negligence − Mop (towel) left in peritoneal cavity of patient while performing sterilization operation leading to complications and death− But for the fact that mop was left inside the body causing peritonitis, death would not have occurred − Doctor held negligent in discharge of duty −Res ipsa loquitur doctrine applied." This case is comparable to the case on hand.
 
58. In view of the above analysis we have no hesitation to conclude that there has been a gross negligence on the part of opposite parties.
 
(6) ’The complainants have produced a final bill of the Suriya Hospital before us which is in tune of Rs. 1,86,849.91 dated 6.12.1995. This has to be granted to her. Subsequently, she must have spent money on medicines, the details of which are not before us but it can easily be computed that she would have spent about a lakh of rupees. She has claimed damages to the tune of 1 crore and 70 lakh for mental agony, etc. Towards this we hereby award Rs. 10 lakh. Complainant has claimed        Rs. 50 lakh towards loss of employment of the husband/As we do not have sufficient evidence for this we are unable to award any compensation. Totally we award Rs. 12,86,850 lakh and cost of Rs. 25,000 against the opposite parties. In case this amount is not paid within 4 weeks of the receipt of this copy of this order by the opposite party the complainant will be entitled to interest on the said amount (r) 9% p.a till the date of payment.
1 Like

manu (advocate)     22 October 2009

thank u sirs

Raj Kumar Makkad (Adv P & H High Court Chandigarh)     29 October 2009

gud info provided. thanx a lot on my part also.

K. Rajendra Prakash (Advocate)     07 November 2009

This definetely amounts to negligence on the part of the Doctors.

K. Rajendra Prakash (Advocate)     11 November 2009

Mr. Ahmed ji, thanks for good information.

shrikant chede (law officer)     08 December 2010

Thanks sir for information

Parijat Kaul (Consultant)     08 December 2010

Aap Ki Kachehri returns for season-3 . It is a reality show that offers to spread legal awareness through masses by by way of on show civil disputes resolution between two parties through the process of arbitration/mediation.

The show is open to cases of Gender discrimination, s*xual minorities discrimination, live-in partners disputes, parent-child matters, sibling rivalry, inter faith/ caste matrimony issues, khap affected relationships etc. The idea is to get representation from a cross sections of society to present a complete picture and send the message that knowing your Legal Rights is an important thing and one can find resolution to most of the civil dispute through mediation.

This is however important that the both the parties must come forward for mediation whether they finally agree on the settlement during the show or not is a different matter. Participants in the programme be able to speak hindi/ hindustani/ Urdu

Contact:

Aap Ki Kachehri - Kiran ke saath

P.O. Box No. 37454

JB nagar Post Office

Andheri (E)

Mumbai – 400059


Email: aapkikachehri@bigsynergy.tv

K S M Tripathi (Solicitor/Advocate)     23 April 2011

This definetely amounts as a negligence on the part of the Doctors.


 


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  



Post a Suggestion for LCI Team
Post a Legal Query