Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

ad_puneet (Advocate)     15 June 2010

ESI Amendment Act 2010-Sailent Features- Implications

Dear Friends

 

As you are aware that the ESI Amendment Act 2010 has been notified and it has come in to effect w.e.f. 01-06-2010. The ESI Amendment Act 2010 has brought new changes which are necessary to be understood by all HRM & other Labour Law practitioners.

 Following are the important amendments and its implications:-

 1.  Sec. 2 clause (6A)(a)(i) & (ii) -The age of the dependents has been increased from 18 years to 25 years-though in the proposed bill, the age suggested was 21 years.

 

2.  Sec. 2 Clause(6A)(11)-"Family"- A qualification has been attached to the "dependent parents" of the Insured Person to avail the medical benefits etc under the Act, which was not in the Act earlier.

               Sub Clause (v) of Clause 11 of Section 2 has been substituted with words " dependent parents, whose income from all sources does not exceed such income as may be prescribed by the Central Government".

 

3.  Sec. 2 Clause(6A)(11)-"Family" - New members has been introduced to the words "Family" - Sub Clause (vi) of Clause 11 of Section 2 has been inserted, which says " in case the insured person is unmarried and his or her parents are not alive, a minor brother or sister wholly dependant upon the earnings of the insured person" shall also form part of family of the Insured Person.

 

4.  Traniees appointed under the Standing Orders- ESI Contribution liable to be paid - The definition of the "employee" has been amended. Now the trainees are brought under the ambit of the Act and are liable to pay ESI contribution.  Clause 9 of Section 2 has been AMENDED.

 

5. FACTORY -DEFINITION-Clause 12 of Section 2 has been amended - The old definition and New definition of Factory needs to be compared, thus I am reproducing the both for ready reference:-

 

Old Definition:- Prior to ESI Amendment Act 2010

 

 Sec 2 (12) “factory” means any premises including the precincts thereof-

(a)          whereon ten or more persons are employed or were employed FOR WAGES on any day of the preceding twelve months, and in any part of which a manufacturing process is being carried on with the aid of power or is ordinarily so carried on, or

(b)          whereon twenty or more persons are employed or were employed for wages on any day of the preceding twelve months, and in any part of which a manufacturing process is being carried on without the aid of power or is ordinarily so carried on,

but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 (35 of 1952) or a railway running shed];

 

NEW DEFINITION:-

Sec 2 (12) "factory" means any premises including the precincts thereof whereon ten or more persons are employed or were employed on any day of the preceding twelve months, and in any part of which a manufacturing process is being carried on or is ordinarily so carried on, but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the Mines Act, 1952 or a railway running shed;’.

 

On comparing the both the following implications of the amendment comes out:-

·         Now the units where manufacturing activities are performed by 10 or more PERSONS has been brought under the ambit of the Act, irrespective of use of POWER and irrespective of the fact that 10 or more coverable employees are engaged or not.

 

·         The definition of the "Factory" has been amended to bring the small units within the ambit of the Act. Earlier the ESI Act was applicable to units employing 10 or more persons manufacturing with aid of "POWER"- Now the word POWER has been omitted. Thus, every unit manufacturing and employing 10 or more persons has been brought under the ambit of the ESI Act.

 

·         Secondly, one hidden amendment has been made in the Act-The uncovered employees would also be counted for the purpose of applicability of the ESI Act. Earlier the unit employing 10 or more workers and doing manufacturing process, would still be out of the purview of the Act, if there are Persons drawing salary above the prescribe limit. Let me explain with an example-

 

Suppose in a unit there were 12 employees and using Power to manufacture. Out of the said 12 employees 3 employees were drawing salary above the prescribed limit of Rs. 10000/-(or 15000/-). The ESI Act would not be applicable on the said unit, since the strength of the coverable employees is less than 10.

 But now, the ESI Corpn. has very smartly omitted the words " for wages" in the new definition of the "Factory", bringing all the units employing 10 or more Persons and engaged in manufacturing process within its ambit.

 

    The ESI Corporation has brought back the old definition of "factory" as it stood prior to Amendment Act 44 of 1966. In the old definition (prior to 1966) the "Factory" means any premises including the precincts thereof wherein 20 or more persons are WORKING or were WORKING on any day of the preceding twelve months, and in any part of which a manufacturing process is being carried on with the aid of power or is ordinarily so carried on, but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the INDIAN Mines Act, 1923 (iv OF 1923) or a railway running shed".

  After the amendment by Act 44 of 1966 as aforementioned the words "or were working" in the definition of 'factory' were substituted by the words "or employed or were employed for wages".

 

It was necessary to know the old definition of the Factory to understand the exact implication of the latest amendment in the definition of "Factory".

 

6. TEST INSPECTIONS & RE-INSPECTIONS:- The system of Test inspection or Re-inspection has been introduced in the Act. This system was though prevalent in practice but did not have any statutory force behind it. Now by inserting Sub-section (4) in Section 45, the ESI Corp. has legitimized its acts of test inspection.

 

7. LIMITATION PERIOD:- The unbridled powers of the visiting inspectors demanding the contribution for the very old periods also, have been put to hold by the Parliament (on the recommendations of the Apex Court). The New Proviso has been inserted in Section 45A, which provides as under

  "Provided further that no such order shall be passed by the Corporation in respect of the period beyond five years from the date on which the contribution shall become payable.". 

 

 

8. APPELLATE AUTHORITY:- New Section 45AA has been introduced in the Act, providing for an appeal to the appellate authority against the orders passed u/s 45-A.

        "45AA. If an employer is not satisfied with the order referred to in section 45A, he may prefer an appeal to an appellate authority as may be provided by regulation, within sixty days of the date of such order after depositing twenty-five per cent. of the contribution so ordered or the contribution as per his own calculation, whichever is higher, with the Corporation:

Provided that if the employer finally succeeds in the appeal, the Corporation shall refund such deposit to the employer together with such interest as may be specified in the regulation."

 

9.  ACCIDENTS OCCURING WHILE COMMUTING TO PLACE OF WORK AND VICE-VERSA - COVERED UNDER THE ACT-    New Section 51E has been inserted

 

     "51 E. An accident occurring to an employee while commuting from his residence to the place of employment for duty or from the place of employment to his residence after performing duty, shall be deemed to have arisen out of and in the course of employment if nexus between the circumstances, time and place in which the accident occurred and the employment is established.".

 

 Apart from the above said amendments some more amendments has been made in the ESI Amendment Act 2010. For text the notification may be referred. 

 

Hope you all will find the above information useful.

 

Regards

 

Puneet Gupta (Advocate)

 



Learning

 6 Replies

ad_puneet (Advocate)     15 June 2010

Dear Friends

I am attaching the copy of ESI Amendment ACT 2010-Gazette Notification

 

Regards

Puneet Gupta, Advocate

 


Attached File : 10 10 esi amendment act 2010 gazette notification 01 06 10.pdf downloaded: 1071 times

Ramamurthy SIvakumar (MANAGER - FINANCE)     09 September 2010

Dear Sir

Thank you very much  for the information . However i would like to understand that whether ESI act will be applicable to Mining  and processing units in side the mines  . The ESI act clearly states that ESI act will not be applicable to mining Operations as defined in the MInes Act.  I the Mining act, it is clearly stated that the  wages paid  for the workers in the processing unit of the mining industry are considered as Wages paid for mining oprations. The only condition is that the processing unit should be in side the mines area and the mineral excavted from the mines can not be sold with out further processing.

In view of this , I will be much obliged if you could offer your valued opinion  in this regard

R.Sivakumar

P V Sankar (Practising Chartered Accountant)     10 October 2010

What is the procedure to be followed for filing appeal against order u/s 45 ? is there any specific form/format for filing the appeal ? can anyone give a model of grounds of appeal and the format in which it has to be filed ? thanks

Rama mohan Acharya (Manager HR(Legal))     13 October 2010

A simple yet nice analysis by Puneet. Thanks

RAVI RANGANATHAN (propritor)     17 May 2012

Sir, I run a Software Services Company in Kolkata . My unit was registered under the ESIC ACT w.e.f. Feb. 2011 in September  2011 after inspection of records by an ESI inspector . I was given a provisional ESI number . A feww ago, a new inspector came for final inspection and saw the same docs as were seen by the earlier inspector . He says that ESI is applicable for my unit from June 2010 because the act changed that month .I had 26 employees in June 2010 out of which 18 employees were drawing less than Rs. 15,000. In Feb 2011 , i had 27 employees of which 17 were drawings below Rs. 15,000/- While the previous inspector had said that the Act pertaining to my unit changed in Feb 2011 where-by number of employees was no longer an issue , the new inspector says that in June 2010 , any unit with more than 10 employees was to come under ESI .

 

I dont know who is right . My unit does not manufacture anything . We only make drawings on the computer which we send by the internet to our customer .

 

Please advise .

 

Ravi Ranganathan

pradip agarwal (director)     20 September 2013

Our company has 7 employees receiving wages less than 7500 and 3 directors receiving salary 30000 per month. do we fall under ESI Act


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register