Bank dacoity and related legal matters

In criminal cases, the party is the Police, and the manager's position is only as a prosecution witness only.  Hence, the manager after receiving the summons should stand before the court for examination/cross-examination.  There is not legally mandatory to attend each hearing.  But, in sensitive cases that have occurred long ago, the police, advocate for prosecution may change, and the presence of a manager is necessary to help to cross-examine the criminals or for other purposes or to explain events, as police rarely go through the entire record and remember the events, as they have to remember the facts of several cases.  

Why closure report?

If it is that there is no break through, how come the Manager is summoned to the Court?

Moreover, a docoity is not an ordiinary incident; the Bank would have laid down norms to deal with such contingencies.

Sir,

Such a poor reply is without judging the actual problem.Only superficial answer without going into the minute details of the case.

Police gives summons not for identification but for giving no objection of their closure which Court asks Bank's view but Bank's higher authority is silent .So it rests on the shoulder of the then who even after retirement is made scapegoat.

With regards,

Suhita Mukherjee