Mr. John, thanks for your comment
I agreed with you, nobody can complain after signing the contract, as it must be abide by. my issue was not that.
my issue is, whether contract / appointment letter is always lawful? whether it follow any uniform legal/administrative guidelines?
my issue is to weigh the validity of contract. as per law contract infringe basic rights of employee.
undoubtely human party even very qualified candidates sign the unfavourable contract but in very adverse condition. in these days where regular post are advertised very less while contract appointment evein govt sector became way of life at large level. therefore even highly qualified candidates are bound to sign them.
do you think it is ethical?
IS IT NOT THE DUTY OF STATE TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS OF EMPLOYEE??????
definetely law doesnot understand emotions, it understand objectivley the written word.
but had the law not understand the emotions, the human rights would not have come in light.
for example in black marketing , people buy thing with consent , but it is totally unethical.
just for cutting cost, run the work as you said (in govt also) contract appointments are done at the cost of exploitation of employee. at the cost of encrooaching their basic rights. on paper it might seem ethical. but from the perspective of human right, it is exploitation.
Please don't think I am derailing from main agenda. but law expert must think over the aspects BEHIND THE CONTRACT APPOINTMENT AND BEYOND THE CONTRACT APPOINTMENT AND ULTIMATELY REEPERCUSSION OF CONTRACT EMPLOYEMENT
thanks and regards