I FEEL THE SAME DOES NOT AMOUNTS TO VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT AS THE SAME AMOUNTS TO CURRENT EVENT AND AMENABLE TO BE INTERPRETED UNDER S.52 OF INDIAN COPYRIGHT ACT, 1957 WHICH LIST OUT CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS WHERE IN aCTS DOES NOT AMOUNTS TO VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT. FIND THE RELAVANT SECTION AS UNDER:-
52.Certain acts not to infringement of:- (1) The following acts shall not constitute an infringement of copyright, namely : ---
(b) a fair dealing with a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work for the purpose of reporting current events ---
( i ) in a newspaper, magazine or similar periodical, or
( ii ) by radio-diffusion or in a cinematograph film or by means of photographs;
ITS A MATTER OF PROPER INTERPRETATION THATS THE REASON, WHY MANY WEBSITES, TV ETC SHOW CONCURRENTLY
NO BODY CAN HAVE COPYRIGHT OVER CURRENT EVENTS, ONLY THING IS ONE CAN HAVE COPYRIGHT OVER THE UNIQUE MANNER IN WHICH YOU HAVE PUBLISHED AS AN ARTICLE, USING ONE'S SWEAT OF MIND.