Exclusive HOLI Discounts!
Get Courses and Combos at Upto 50% OFF!
Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Raj Kumar Makkad (Adv P & H High Court Chandigarh)     27 September 2010

BAD PRECEDENT 'SC'S ORDER AMOUNTS TO UNDUE INTERFERENCE.'

The supreme court's deferral order on the Allahabad high court's verdict on the Ayodhya title suits, which was to be delivered on Friday, is uncalled for and unprecedented. Is a higher court competent to stop a lower court from pronouncing a judgment? That amounts to exceeding its powers and interfering in the working of the lower court. The issue before the court was not an appeal on the merit of a judgment, which it has the power to entertain or reject, but the timing of the judgment. If it is taken as a precedent, the courts in future will have to accept requests to keep in cold storage judgments inconvenient to parties on some ground or the other. The normal judicial process, which is as it is tortuous and slow, will suffer more if the power to give a judgment is suspended for any reason.


The plea before the high court to postpone the judgment had been rightly rejected by a majority bench on the ground that the petitioner had no locus standi in the matter. He was also fined for his attempt to interfere in the court's working. The supreme court could have at best reviewed the quantum of his punishment but not the reiterated decision of the court to deliver its judgment on schedule. The plea for postponement was based on the argument that the security forces, which are overstretched for various reasons, might not be able to deal effectively with any communal disturbance in the wake of the judgment and the parties to the Babri Masjid dispute should be given another chance for an out-of-court judgment. But the governments at the Centre and the states had said they had made adequate security arrangements. That is the responsibility of the executive and why should the court doubt its ability? The high court also had given a last opportunity for a negotiated settlement between the parties but there was no result. Does the supreme court think that a negotiated solution which was not possible for many decades will be found in the next few days?


As part of the security preparations, governments had made deployments of personnel, declared holidays and made other precautionary arrangements. The supreme court has probably unsettled those plans by introducing an element of uncertainty into them. The court should have allowed the legal process to take its course, leaving other considerations to those whose duty it is to handle them.

 



Learning

 6 Replies

V. VASUDEVAN (LEGAL COUNSEL)     27 September 2010

Sir, I completely endorse your views. This is rather political than judicial!

Arup (UNEMPLOYED)     28 September 2010

Is a higher court competent to stop a lower court from pronouncing a judgment?

- YES OFCOURSE, WHY NOT?

That amounts to exceeding its powers and interfering in the working of the lower court.

- NO. NOT AT ALL.

Arup (UNEMPLOYED)     28 September 2010

BAD PRECEDENT 'SC'S ORDER AMOUNTS TO UNDUE INTERFERENCE.

- IT WAS NOT UNDUE INTERFERENCE BUT AN UNWISE DECISSION, BECAUSE BOTH THE OPPONANTS CLEARED THEIR STANDS BEFORE FILING THE APPEAL BY MR TRIPATHY AT SC, - THROUGH MEDIA. WHEN THERE WAS NO SCOPE TO RESUME THE FURTHER TALKS, IT WAS UNWISE TO ENTERTAIN THE APPEAL.

HOWEVER BY THIS TIME RESULT KNOWN TO ALL OF US.


(Guest)

SC order is correct but probably politically motivated.

RAJ KISHORE VAISH (TEACHER CITIZEN OF INDIA)     19 October 2010

Dear Sir

                     Supreme Court has been blackmailed in other words.


(Guest)

Supreme Court has unlimited powers as Judges do not get impeached. Its a political order, no doubt but since politicians themselves created this problem for getting votes, Supreme Court has used "Poson kills poison". I think Supreme Court has resolved the religious tensions to a large extent.  When they reach the supreme Court, I bet there will be a presidential reference under Article 143 of the Constituion. Suprte Court will tire politicians so that they work for the people and do their job properly.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register