Is there a precedent case stating surety not getting discharged on creditor's impartmemt of extra time to principal debtor without any involvement of third party. NOTE- it covers section 135 and not 136
Principal debtor's company defaulted on it's term of Contract of shipping the "touchscreens" in 4 weeks. The creditor being the family friend to P.D. "extended the time" but surety sued them for it's discharge from the contract on this ground.