In an ongoing Arbitration (over 2 years now) recently responsent filed an application in High Court challenging that Arbitrator is biased (with proofs / witness). Upon seeing the application and background of the case, High Court directed the Arbitrator that he can proceed but CAN NOT pass the final award.
Current status of proceedings: Cross examination is going on.
Case history / dispute: Employement bond. Restructiing employee to start his own business after terminating her from the job. No salary given for 9 months.
My arguement is - Can Arbitration be sustained or it is valid if the contract or dispute is against public policy, against fundamental right of a person and hit by Section 27 of Indian Contract Act?
Should I carry on with proceedings when I observed that the contract and clause is voidable in court of law?
What shoud I do as there is pressure from client?