“lifting of the veil” in case of Domestic violence Act
In the present case, Eveneet and Prashant were living together. No doubt, the suit
premises are not owned by either of them; the documents on record prima facie disclose that
exclusive title and right is of Kavita, the mother-in-law. Yet, having regard to the previous
discussion, Kavita is undoubtedly a “respondent” in whose household, the couple lived together.
The Court here cannot be oblivious of the circumstance that Prashant moved out when the
relationship became stormy; the possibility of the eviction suit having been filed as a pre-emptive
move, to bring it within the Batra formulation cannot be ruled out at this stage. In the context,
the Court holds that what cannot be done directly, cannot be achieved indirectly through
stratagem. If the Court can look beyond the facts, and in a given case, conclude that the overall
conspectus of circumstances, suggests manipulation by the husband or his relatives, to defeat a
right inhering in the wife, to any order under Section 19, such “lifting of the veil” should be
resorted to. Therefore, the plaintiff indeed has a right of residence under the Domestic Violence
