Now a days misuse of the woman protection Act is too much in fact without any base just like a Dears Hord every woman has started alligating her husband and inlaws if we believe the statistics behind the conviction under 498A cases it is only 12 % rest all the cases either are declared unproved or false. Her simple statement in the court will be considered as the truth and husband will be sply behind the bars and he has to take a bail either AB or gregular it is the atrocity of the protection Act for the woman. Seeing all this the Appex court has given directions in the Jan 2015 that no arrest should be made with out approval and ordser of the court of the 1st class magistrate or by order of the Dy. Suprintendent of the Police direct and not merely on the police complaint by the applicant.
Now in your case it is the matter of trial that both the parties has to establish that who belongs to the her Stridhan and why not he / she should be convicted for the same. here her circumstances at the time of her leaving the matrimonial home pleads a vital role to show the apprihension that where are the her Jewellarys sply.Or iof the Husband can show the evidence in the court that how she took the all her belongings with her at the time of leaving her matrimonial home.SASURAL.
You are further advised to cooperate with the IO at the time of investigation of the case and provide and show her all the relevant evidences which indicate that she has taken all her Stridhan with her. This is only the way by which you can get remove the Stridhan related 406 removed at the stage of investigation status report itself. But for this you have to be pro active and cooperative with the IO in her investigation.