Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Victim of Greed (Worker)     17 August 2013

Regarding interim maintenance arrears

Hello Experts,

To start with, Just an overview of my case :-

She had filed DV petition alongwith interim maintenance for herself almost a year back. The court had passed an interim maintenance order of Rs. 3,000/- per month for her as she had declared unemployed. Earlier, she was working in a multinational newspaper and she is also well qualified and was drawing a salary of Rs. 16,000 - 20,000 per month in the year 2009. I have filed an appeal in the sessions court in last week based on judgements of no maintenance for well educated and capable women, alongwith condonation of delay (80 days) and application for stay. I am running the case in person due to financial crisis.

Today was my court date and she had filed application for recovery of arrears of Rs. 15,000/- (5 months maintenance). I will filing my reply in the next date for the same.
 
I am drawing a salary of Rs. 8,500/- per month and am already paying Rs. 2,500/- for minor son which is been ordered me to pay by the Family Court as interim maintenance. That means, overall, I have to pay Rs. 5,500/- per month as against my salary of Rs. 8,500/-.

Now, my question is :-
 
As per the procedure, on the first date in the sessions court, she will file her reply on my condonation of delay. What i have learnt is, since I am representing the case in person, Judge MAY allow my condonation of delay application on the first date itself. BUT can I emphasize to put a stay on the interim maintenance order been passed by the lower court AND will the judge do it on the first date itself ???
 
IF NOT, then what will happen after i file my reply for her application for recovery of arrears in the lower court ??? Will the lower court pass an order for recovery of arrears from me ? IF YES, then is it some kind of harassment from the court also towards every husband even after appealing to the order ? I am genuinely not able to pay Rs. 5,500/- per month against my salary of Rs. 8,500/-... Does that mean I should not have food but feed her ??????????
 
Please advice me !!!!!!!!!!
 


Learning

 9 Replies

sridher (system analyst)     17 August 2013

search for Shinarayan dingra judgements

 

previously working woman no maintanace and qualified wife no maintanance

 

if you dont get reply to my mail id

Victim of Greed (Worker)     17 August 2013

Hello Sridher,

what will happen after i file my reply for her application for recovery of arrears in the lower court ??? Will the lower court pass an order for recovery of arrears from me ?

2BHelpfull (Other)     17 August 2013

why didnot u argue in court about ur salary slip , ur wife education qualification before maintenance order was passed


why didn't u argue the case before Maintenance order is passed ???

 

can I emphasize to put a stay on the interim maintenance order been passed by the lower court AND will the judge do it on the first date itself ???

it depend on how u argue the case.

 

Will the lower court pass an order for recovery of arrears from me ?

Court will give u time within which u have to clear ur arrears

Victim of Greed (Worker)     17 August 2013


why didnot u argue in court about ur salary slip , ur wife education qualification before maintenance order was passed


why didn't u argue the case before Maintenance order is passed ???


 

I had already argued on all the qualification but the judge had mentioned in the order that it is every husband's duty to maintain his wife..

 



Will the lower court pass an order for recovery of arrears from me ?

Court will give u time within which u have to clear ur arrears


What if I do not pay the arrears inspite of they knowing my salary amount ??? Will they put me behind bars ??? If yes, then I am ready to go for it... I will go behind bars BUT will again FIGHT once I am been released.

 

2BHelpfull (Other)     17 August 2013

before passing the order of maintenance, u must have argue ur case regarding ur salary slip , ur wife education qualification.

why didnot u argue ur case then ????

 

can I emphasize to put a stay on the interim maintenance order been passed by the lower court AND will the judge do it on the first date itself ???
 

it depend on how u argue the case,

 

Will the lower court pass an order for recovery of arrears from me ?

Court will give u some time to clear ur arrear,

 

Victim of Greed (Worker)     17 August 2013

What if the lower court give me 6 months to clear my arrears and before completion of 6 months the sessions court put a stay on interim order EVEN then will i have to pay my arrears ?

Manoj Kumar Jain (abc)     17 August 2013

You dont escape from arrears. Avoiding arrear may lead to negative impact on your case. Final order should be passed on the basis of evidence so just fight case on merit. best of luck and enjoy the trial and concentrate only on life.

Nadeem Qureshi (Advocate/ nadeemqureshi1@gmail.com)     17 August 2013

Dear querist

the lower court can not stay on arrears if the session court have not passed any stay order.  approached to the court of session for stay the execution proceeding till the final disposal of your appeal otherwise the lower court either recover the money  from you or sent to jail due to non payment of arrears/interim or final maintenance. as per section 125 (3) of Cr.pc

125. Order for maintenance of wives, children and parents.

(1) If any person leaving sufficient means neglects or refuses to maintain-

(a) his wife, unable to maintain herself, or

(b) his legitimate or illegitimate minor child, whether married or not, unable to maintain itself, or

(c) his legitimate or illegitimate child (not being a married daughter) who has attained majority, where such child is, by reason of any physical or mental abnormality or injury unable to maintain itself, or

(d) his father or mother, unable to maintain himself or herself,

A Magistrate of’ the first class may, upon proof of such neglect or refusal, order such person to make a monthly allowance for the maintenance of his wife or such child, father or mother, at such monthly rate1[***] as such magistrate thinks fit, and to pay the same to such person as the Magistrate may from time to time direct::

Provided that the Magistrate may order the father of a minor female child referred to in clause (b) to make such allowance, until she attains her majority, if the Magistrate is satisfied that the husband of such minor female child, if married, is not possessed of’ sufficient means.

2[Provided further that the Magistrate may, during the pendency of the Proceeding regarding monthly allowance for the maintenance under this sub-section, order such person to make a monthly allowance for the interim maintenance of his wife or such child, father or mother, and the expenses of such proceeding which the Magistrate considers reasonable, and to pay the same to such person as the Magistrate may from time to time direct:

Provided also that an application for the monthly allowance for the interim maintenance and expenses for proceeding under the second proviso shall, as far as possible, be disposed of within sixty days from the date of the service of notice of the application to such person]

Explanation. For the purposes of this Chapter.

(a) minor means a person who, under the provisions of the Indian Majority Act, 1975 (9 of 1875) is deemed not to have attained his majority;

(b) “Wife” includes a woman who has been divorced by, or has obtained a divorce from, her husband and has not remarried.

3[(2) Any Such allowance for the maintenance or interim maintenance and expenses for proceeding shall be payable from the date of the order, or, if so ordered, from the date of the application for maintenance or interim maintenance and expenses of proceeding, as the case may be.]

(3) If any Person so ordered fails without sufficient cause to comply with the order, any such Magistrate may, for every breach of the order, issue a warrant for levying the amount due in the manner provided for levying fines, and may sentence such person, for the whole, or any part of each month’s 4[ allowance for the maintenance or the interim maintenance and expenses of proceeding, as the case be,] remaining unpaid after the execution of the warrant, to imprisonment for a term which may extend to one month or until payment if sooner made:

Provided that no warrant shall be issued for the recovery of any amount due under this section unless application be made to the court to levy such amount within a period of one year from the dare on which it became due:

Provided further that if such person offers to maintain his wife on condition of her living with him, and she refuses to live with him, such Magistrate may consider any grounds of refusal stated by her, and may make an order under this section notwithstanding such offer, if he is satisfied that there is just ground for so doing.

Explanation. If a husband has contracted marriage with another woman or keeps a mistress, it shall be considered to be just ground for his wife’s refusal to live with him.

(4) No wife shall be entitled to receive an 4allowance from her husband under this section she is living in adultery, or if, without any sufficient reason, if she refuses to live with her husband, or if they are living separately by mutual consent.

(5) On proof that any wife in whose favour an order has been made under this section is living in adultery, or that without sufficient reason she refuses to live with her husband, or that they are living separately by mutual consent, the Magistrate shall cancel the order.

1. The words “not exceeding five hundred rupees in the whole” omitted by Act 50 of 2001, sec.2 (w.e.f. 24-9-2001).

2. Ins. by Act 50 of 2001, sec.2 (w.e.f. 24-9-2001).

3. Subs. By Act 50 of 2001, sec 2, for sub-section (2) (w.e.f. 24-9-200).

4. Subs. By Act 50 of 2001, sec 2, for “allowance” (w.e.f. 24-9-200).

STATE AMENDMENTS

Madhya Pradesh:

In section 125, in sub-section (1), for the words “five hundred rupees” the words m’ “three thousand rupees” shall be substituted.

[Vide M.P. (Act 10 of 1998), sec. 3 (w.e.f. 29-54998)] [Ed. This amendment has been I made prior to the enactment of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2001 W (Central Act 50 of 2001) whereby the words "not exceeding five hundred rupees in the I whole" have been omitted by sec. 2 (w.e.f. 24-9-2001)].

Maharashtra:

In section 125,-

(a) in sub-section (1),-

(i) for the words “not exceeding five hundred rupees” the words “not I exceeding fifteen hundred rupees” shall be substituted;

(ii) before the existing proviso, the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:-

Provided that, the Magistrate on an application or submission being made, supported by an affidavit by the person who has applied for the maintenance under this sub-section, for payment of interim maintenance, on being satisfied that, there is a prima facie ground for making such order, may direct the person against whom the application for maintenance has been made, to pay a reasonable amount by way of interim maintenance to the applicant, pending the final disposal of the maintenance application:

Provided further that, such order for payment of interim maintenance may, in an appropriate case, also be made by the Magistrate ex parte, pending service of notice of the application, subject, however, to the condition that such an order shall be liable to be modified or even cancelled after the respondent is heard in the matter:

Provided also that, subject to the ceiling laid down under this sub-section, the amount of interim maintenance shall, as far as practicable, be not less than thirty per cent of the monthly income of the respondent.”;

(iii) in the existing proviso, for the words “Provided that” the words

“Provided also that” shall be substituted;

(b) after sub-section (2), the following sub-section shall be inserted, namely:-

(2A) Notwithstanding anything otherwise contained in sub-sections (1) and (2), where an application is made by the wife under clause (a) of sub-section (1) for the maintenance allowance, the applicant may also seek relief that the order may be made for the payment of maintenance allowance in lump-sum in lieu of the payment of monthly maintenance allowance, and the Magistrate may, after taking into consideration all the circumstances obtaining in the case including the factors like the age, physical condition, economic conditions and other liabilities and commitments of both the parties, pass an order that the respondent shall pay the maintenance allowance in lump-sum in lieu of the monthly maintenance allowance, covering a specified period, not exceeding five years at a time, or for such period which may exceed five years, as may be mutually agreed to, by the parties.”;

(c) in sub-section (3),-

(i) after the words “so ordered” the words, brackets, figures and letter “either under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2A), as the case may be,” shall be inserted;

(ii) after the words “each month’s allowance” the words “or, as the case may be, the lump-sum allowance to be paid in lieu of the monthly allowance” shall be inserted.

[Vide Maharashtra Act, 21 of 1999 sec. 2 (w.e.f. 20-4-1999)] [Ed. These amendments have been made prior to the enactment of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2001 (Central Act 50 of 2001) sec. 2 (w.e.f. 24-9-2001)].

Tripura:

In section 125, for the words “five hundred rupees” the words “one thousand five hundred rupees” shall be substituted.

[Vide Tripura Act, 9 of 1999 sec. 2 (w.e.f. 9-4-1999}] [Ed. This Amendment has been made prior to the enactment of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2001 (Central Act 50 of 2001) whereby the words" not exceed of five hundred rupees in the whole" have been omitted by sec. 2 (w.e.f. 24-9-2001)].

STATE AMENDMENTS

West Bengal:

In Sub-section (1) -

For the words “five hundred rupees” the words “one thousand and five hundred rupees” shall be submitted.

(2) After the existing proviso, following proviso shall be inserted, namely.

“Provided further that where in any proceeding under this section it appears to the Magistrate that the wife referred o in clause (a) or the minor child referred to in clause (b) or the child (not being a married daughter) referred o in clause (c) or the father or the mother referred o in clause (d) is in need of immediate relief for her or its or his support and the necessary expenses of the proceeding, the Magistrate may, on the application of the wife or the minor child or the child (not being a married daughter) or the father or the mother, as the case may be, order the person against whom the allowance for maintenance is claimed, to pay to the petitioner, pending the conclusion of the proceeding the expenses of the proceeding, and monthly during the proceeding such allowance as having regard to the income of such person, it may seem to the Magistrate to be reasonable.

[Vide West Bengal Act 25 of 1992 (w.e.f. 2-8-1993)] [Ed. This Amendment has been made prior to the enactment of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2001 (Central Act 50 of 2001) whereby the words "not exceed of five hundred rupees in the whole" have been omitted by sec. 2 (w.e.f, 24-9-2001

Victim of Greed (Worker)     19 August 2013

Thank you Nadeem ji,

If you read carefully, I have already filed an application for stay and the interim maintenance order is passed for her under Dv Act and not under 125 Cr.P.C.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register