Dear sir,
we are residence of below mentioned Mhada bld-Khapridev sadan,(Respondent no.15).Sir,we would like to know effect or meaning of this order.
Regards
PRASAD SANKPAL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.176 OF 2013
Siroya Developers Pvt. Ltd. .. Petitioners.
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents.
Mr.Akshay P. Jadhav for the Petitioners.
Mr.D.A. Nalawade Government Pleader for Respondent Nos.1, 2, 5,
13 and 14.
Ms.Mansi Joshi i/b Ms.Sharmila U. Deshmukh for Respondent Nos.3,
11 and 12.
Mr.Abhay Parab for Respondent Nos.6 and 15.
CORAM : S. J. VAZIFDAR &
A. K. MENON, JJ.
DATED : 11TH JULY, 2014
P.C.
1. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the consent
terms which are only between the Petitioners and Respondent Nos.6
and 15. The consent terms are merely taken on record and marked
“X” for identification. It is expressly clarified that the same does not
affect the rights of any other parties in any manner whatsoever. The
parties shall take any action entirely at their risk and responsibility.
This order does not compel the parties to do anything. Any action
taken must only be in accordance with law and only after obtaining
the permissions from the concerned authorities, if necessary.
(A.K. MENON, J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.)
Shiv
