Dear experts, I will try to explain better:
This is before medical council. Opposition (hospital) is not submitting a crucial blood report (R2)
which will show their treatment was wrong.
So we filed I.A asking for it to be submitted. they submitted another blodd reporrt (R1). instead of submitting (R2).
Here, I am using R1 and R2 to refer to two different blood reports.
We filed 2nd I.A asking court to direct opposition to submit (R1) and not (R2).
Opposition has filed objection to the I.A stating blood report (R1) may be substituted for (blood report R2) and hence no need for submission of blood report (R2)
So you see that I.A is for court to direct blood report (R1) should be submitted. But in its objection
Oppostion is tryingt o slip in different issue which is substituting blood report (R1) for blood report (r2). But is this not a different matter altogether?
Now opposition is seekng to substitute (blood report R1) in place of blood report (R2) as part of an I.A which is seeking that blood report (R1) should be submitted
Is it possible to object/rejoinder - i dont know the legal terms - to Opposition's objection and basically say that different issue is being pushed into this I.A?
i hope this is more clear. Many thanks