I am not against TEP.This case can be in addition to TEP.
In 498a and package of cases, it is always mentioned that girl side has made an expenditure of 15-50 lacs and also produces fake inovices/jwellary bills.
Now if we move to court and claim that they have not made such a expenditure.This is just to extort money.if we have some proofs/telephonic recording.Then court will summon the jwellary shop,income tax dept before registering the case
Case 1.- Favouring the querist
Now once the jweller declines in the court that he has not sold jwellary to them.Income tax dept also declare that they have paid the tax in line with the expenses.
Now you can file TEP to income tax,they cannot decline the info-already shared with court.IT dept will also fear that if they donot share details,they will be again dragged to court.
Before the trial stage of 498a/DP , you will have the required info in your hand and also a case running against them.
May be you can register one mofre case for fake bills.
Case 2- Favouring Girl -Very less chances
a. Case rejected - No worries - atleast you tried - Girl side will understand that you are not only defensive,attacking also.
b. Court summons jweller & income tax deptt (Before directing police to register)- supports their claim
Then also you have solid clues about their income and you can prepare yourself for the case better.
Soni sir has fought his case very strongly and helping large no of victims.Hatts off to him.
Expecting your comment...