LCI Learning
New LIVE Course: Toxicology and Law. Batch begins 21st July. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

subs (doctor)     03 September 2013

Divorce legalities

Dear Experts,

 

I am Dr Subramanya Upadhyaya, in UK, married in 2008 in India  to a civil judge's daughter. She filed a DV complaint in UK in 2008 within 3 months of co-habitation, the UK police did investigate and given a clean chit to me as a result she fleed to India and slapped 498a (alleged criminalities took place in UK with my parents t'phonic instructions to me!! ) against all my family members in 2009. In 2010, my knife filed for divorce on cruelty, desertion and irretrivable break down of marriage whilst asking for IM. I filed RCR the same year. Now the IM is declared Rs, 10,000 per month and I have deposited 4.6 lakhs as arrears already in the court. The RCR and the Divorce have been clubbed for the convenience purpose and 4 times mediation failed so far. The other party, does not want to withdraw the criminal case but demanding divorce with Rs 75,00,000 alimony in the mediation. On the other hand,  a criminal petition for the quashal of 498A is in the HC .

 

Now, my lawyer is saying to me that quashal would not happen and hence will have to face trial as she is a judge's daughter and the laws are biased towards females and to get the justice for a female the court would not quash. At the same time if I ask for a time bound trial, the HC would not approve the same.

 

My question is would that be true that the HC would not give me time bound trial? and regarding my family members do the allegations against them also would not be quashed as they have not  lived with us at all. How can Indain courts trial the alleged crimes happened in UK (jurisdiction) when the police did not take any Central Govt.'s permission at all to investigate (infact they filed the FIR as Final report)

 

My lawyer is sayingthat even if I get an acquittal in the CC (after the trial) she would get the divorce with a whopping amount of alimony declared as its already 4 years of non co-habitation and its a very good ground for divorce! Then if I have to appeal in the HC, I have to deposit the entire amount of the declared alimony in the future. So, I need to pay and settle the matter out of court.

My question is to get the authenticity of the facts which my lawyer is saying. Does she get the divorce even after my acquittal in 498a (cruelty is not proved) and if I have to appeal do I have to deposit in the HC the entire alimony amount declared?

 

 

Please throw some light on this.



 2 Replies

Tajobsindia (Senior Partner )     03 September 2013

·         You should get time bound trial relief from Hon’ble HC if 'pressed' strongly.

·         Discharge of parents – relatives should have been filed as what you allege as facts in your brief read down much earlier.

 

·         Applying for quash against parents – relatives are next option based on facts in your brief.

 

·         Once you get acquittal which may eventually happen as it is matter of patience you are advised to withdraw RCR and file divorce under ‘cruelties’ ground citing acquittal and related facts.

 

·         Grounds have to be proved to get divorce by her and simply not cohabiting as spouse for a decade does not automatically entitle her for decree in divorce ! The advocate is playing with your emotions since you are not physically present to service the case and relying more on international calls to hear progress in such delayed cases piled upon you is my view.

 

·         No, such clause to deposit entire amount is there. Alimony awarded only after contest under S. 25 of HMA and not simply by pleadings that I wanted 75 L or 2 billions ! The remedy if that bridge comes to cross is to place collateral on actual award amount with a condition ‘subject to release if I lose Appeal and dispose matter on merit’ of the Appeal.

 

·         You are getting all worked up un-necessarily as no alimony has been awarded, she has just claimed so and so amount and simply claiming does not mean she will get it.

 

·         The Hindu Marriage Laws Amendment 2013 is not yet Law where using IrBM as you say she uses in her divorce she can claim relief under the new Amendment.

 

·         Finally the advice is to carry forward your patience little longer or in time bound fashion via seeking express relief from Hon’ble HC as already 4 or such years have passed in family litigations and meanwhile work on para 3 and 4 if already not done as un-necessarily relatives are roped in your personal disputes. Also make habit to read daily past discussions in Criminal Law Forum relating to S. 498a and make notes accordingly.

subs (doctor)     04 September 2013

Thanks a lot Tajob.

 

Just a quick clarification, as per the appealing of the divorce is concerned acc. to sec. HMA 28 its not very clear about the deposition of the entire alimony granted in FC prior to the appeal in HC. I am still a bit not very clear about it though.  I agree that I could look into this at that time but wanted to know a bit more so that I could prepare better.

 

By the way, the new move in my case is that the quashal argument is suppose to happen tomorrow but my counsel has pulled out to night at 10.30 stating he is retiring from my case. So, in my 498A case, the Final report which is nothing but the FIR filed by the police quoting me as absconded have not taken any Central Govt.'s permission prior to the investigation. Infact, they have filed the charge sheet (just FIR). Now I have to find another lawyer to argue the quashal petition we have filed against the charge sheet.

 


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register