Upgrad LLM

decision of central information commission

Advocate / Legal Professional

Dear Friends,

I have won the case before the Central Information Commission.

The Case is Shri Atul Kumar Sagar Vs Income Tax Depatmet (Through Shri Sunil Vajpayee, Addl.CIT, Meerut & Shri N. Prasad, ITO, Ward 2(2), Meerut.  

File No. CIC/LS/A/2009/000457

Date of Hearing -22/07/2009

Date of Decision - 22/07/2009



Attached File : 31 atul kr. sagar vs itd at cic.pdf downloaded 219 times
 
Reply   
 
Legal Manager

Hearty Congratulations sir,

 

 

 
Reply   
 


Retired

I received the following decision on my appeal:

The Commission directs the CPIO to show cause as to why a maximum penalty of Rs.25000 should not be levied on him for not replying to the Appellant’s RTI application. The response to reach the Commission within 15 days of receipt of this Order. 

Hold your breadth. The above paragraph has been deliberately left out in the decision uploaded in CIC's public domain.

The above notice was never served on the guilty CPIO. CIC has confirmed to me in writing that his reply is not in the file. Remember that this decision is dated 28/11/2008 and till date everybody is hibernating. As a matter of fact, there appears to be a well planned conspiracy in protecting the CPIO by not sending the order of the CIC and not following it up. There is no way that the entire paragraph was left out in uploading.

Isn't it great?

 
Reply   
 
Advocate / Legal Professional

 Thank You

 
Reply   
 
Retired

 Still having faith in the CIC?

 
Reply   
 
Retired

 To save RTI Act, only a retired High Court Judge should head it and retired district judges should be appointed information commissioners. As long as retired bureaucrats are appointed, we shall continue to lose faith in the efficacy of the implementation of the Act both at the Centre and in the States. 

 
Reply   
 
Retired

It is the duty of the PIO to inform the applicant who the appellate authority is.  When I complained to the Maharashtra State Information Commission that PIO has not furnished me information and not replied to my application, my application was returned and I twas asked to supply him copies of replies received both from the PIO and Appellate Authority. 

Obviously, nobody reads it. Why do we have faith in such institutions?

 
Reply   
 
Advocate / Legal Professional

 Sir, 

I agreed with you,  but we have to fight aganest the system, to be a part of the system. 

 
Reply   
 
Advocate / Legal Professional

Yes,

As an Advocate, I have faith on our legal system.  Because only we can improve the our legal system. 

 
Reply   
 
Retired

 Congrats. Sixty years down the line, 109 amendments to the Constitution and still continuing and unwavering faith and loyalty. Yes, we shall change the system. I marvel at enormous patience.

 
Reply   
 

LEAVE A REPLY


    

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  



 

  Search Forum








×

Menu

CrPC MASTERCLASS!     |    x