TECHNICALLY COUNTER MAINTENANCE
Query from a friend
I need 18 HAMA Judgment to counter her Interim
Judgment k chakkar mein zindagi barbaad mat kijiye.
Is baat ka yakeen kar lo ki tum pehle vyakti ban ne ja rahe ho 18 HAMA mein jo ek jdugment nikalne wala hai.
SAARI JUDGMENT OF 125CRPC, 24HMA, 23DV khod dalo mere bhai.
Ek ek point uthate jao aur put karte jao apne REPLY to 18 HAMA ke andar as a Preliminary Objection (whichever point suits your case).
Let the judge decide which suits best and which does not suit.
TU TENSION MAT LE MERE BHAI.
Tension legi ya teri wife jise prove karna hai apna case ya tension lenge manyavar judge mahodaya kyoki tune prelims put ki hai more than 30 PO on law points (& such law points where other courts have given HC/SC judgments)
Agar judge galat kare ya kisi bhi PO ko na likhe order mein to samajh jaiyo yeh hi hai vo PO jo chal gaya & based on that file appeal/ revision/ recall ya side by side complaint against him for favoring one party (Caution)
ARVIND KEJRIWAL'S TECHNICALITY
Friends, kindly understand the technical aspect worked on by Arvind Kejriwal in Defamation.
On one hand he filed defamation suit on someone.
On another hand, someone filed defamation suit on him.
On third neutral hand he challenged constituional validity of defamation law.
NOW UNDERSTAND THE TECHNICALITY HERE
Even though media is accusing Arvind Kejriwal of playing double standards i.e., on one hand he is filing defamation on someone & on other hand he is challenging constituional validity. But, kindly reaqd below to understand why this is CHIT BHI MERI PAT BHI MERI situation for Kejriwal.
SCENARIO 1:- If defamation law goes then he gets freed from the cases filed on him. These papers he can file in defamation suit filed against him saying that, "DEKHO MAINE TO DEFAMATION LAW KO HI CHALLENGE KAR RAKHA HAI. USKA JAWAB AA LENE DO" Abd when defamation law goes then he is free from liability thereof retropestively (100%)
SCENARIO 2:- If defamation law does not go then his defamation case filed against the opp party becmes strong. So if he has to pay amount in lieu of defaming another then the amount that he will get from someone who defamed him gets adjusted automatically. i.e., directl burden can be shifted. (assuming the amount is same in both cases)