I had a criminal matter where the complainant gives her statement on oath in Hindi & the Magistrate converts it correctly to Marathi. The complainant was also cross-examined in the court after her statement was taken.
The issue is the Complainant after 3-4 months, files a "correction statement for additions to her evidence"
1. Complainant uses her past evidence already recorded by the Magistrate & pinpoints that "I said this, but judge recorded that & so on" for several points....
2. Complainant also falsely asserts that judge has dictated in mrathi so she she cudnt answer when the dictation was done.
3. The complainant also gives additions to her statement & gives certain other changes to be done in her recorded cross-examination statement.
My question is this legally permissible???? I personally dont find it correct but if advocates support filing of such applications, then I get adoubt if its legally allowed.
Please advise for the correct course of action.