My father has one son and 2 daughters(including me). My father had 18 acres of agricultural land which was a coparcenary property. In 1972 my father gave 8 acres of front land to my brother through a consent decree. In this partition, specific killa no.s were given to him and till now he enjoyed it's income. In 2005 he even sold 6 acres of land from his share. In 2005 and 2006 my father transferred his share of 10 acres of land to his wife through 2 release deeds but he did a mistake. In order to save the stamp duty it was written in release deed that it was his"dada lai" property. But the truth is that after partition of 1972 these 10 acres became his exclusive property. Now my sister has challenged these deeds in the court insisting that after 2005 amendment of Hindu succession act, she has a share in the property because her father has admitted in the release deed that it is a "dada lai" property, but legally speaking after partition in 1972 coparcenary came to an end. My father died in 2008. Can you suggest some Supreme Court judgements which support that truth prevails upon admission.
