hello everyone , i need ur valuable input and sujjestion on this as i have a ct date next month :- i had taken a PL from a bank and due to loss of job was unable to pay them so they filed a 138Ni case against me using my security cheque , after a year i got summons from court . meanwhile the bank agency started negotiating after the 1st date in court ,i had to take a bail , finally agreed to their terms and conditions and made 2 payments out of the 8 EMIS agreed upon. now i sumitted an application before the MM mentioning that i am in settlemnt with the said bank and have agreed upon a payment stettlement with them with proofs of payments attached and asked the MM to adjourn the case for as long as it can to which the judge rejected my application and forced the bank lawyer to file an affidavit without which next date will not be granted inspite of the bank lawyer mentioning about the settlement between the both of us , so my question to the forum is , since compounding is possible in 138 NI why my appliction was rejected inspite of me comming to a compromise in the very 2nd hearing .on 1 hand i have already paid 2 instaments to the bank as per the settlement agreement and on the other hand i have to attend to the case which is still running.so in this given senario what should be my POA shud i continue with the payment only if they withdraw the case as the due date of pymt is after 2 days of the next hearing date or shud i stop the payment and fight . thank you in advance
