On 28.3.1974, three farmers, namely Ramesh Chander (hereinafter referred to as ‘the first respondent’), Mahavir Singh and Chunni Lal, entered into an oral agreement with the appellant to sell their respective land measuring 2.039 hectares bearing kha..
This appeal is directed against the judgment of the Division Bench of Calcutta High Court whereby it declined to entertain the appeal filed by the appellant under Section 11(1)(f) of the West Bengal Premises Requisition and Control Act, 1947 (for sho..
The appellant is a body corporate constituted under Section 38 of the Act. In May 1980, the appellant decided to prepare the Scheme covering an area of 104.25 hectares including the land of the respondents comprised in khasra No. 164/2 for constructi..
Facts and circumstances giving rise to this appeal are that the Municipal Committee, Hoshiarpur (hereinafter called the ‘appellant’) had taken an electricity connection on 15.6.1992, for running a tubewell, from the Punjab State Electricity Board (he..
..
Facts and circumstances giving rise to this appeal are that the appellants had been the members of the Modern Co-op. Group Housing Society Ltd. (hereinafter called the ‘Society’) and claimed to have paid all their subscriptions of membership and othe..
This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 18.10.2001 passed in Second Appeal No. 191 of 1991 by the High Court of Bombay by which the Second Appeal filed by the appellants against the judgment and decree of the First Appell..
Sections 457, 380 and 461 IPC..
This appeal, by special leave, is directed against the judgment, dated 9th October 2007, delivered by the High Court of Bombay in Criminal Application No. 3715 of 2005, in a petition filed by the two appellants herein under Section 482 of the Code of..
This appeal, by special leave, is directed against the judgment and order dated 12th July 2002, delivered by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short “the National Commission”) in First Appeal No. 354 of 1996, whereby it set asi..
The All Sikkim Youth Forum, a registered body, filed a writ petition in public interest in the High Court. This appeal was based on a news item which was published in the ‘Sikkim Observer’, a National Hill Weekly, from 13th to 17th November, 2000 und..
The conspectus of the facts would be necessary before we approach further. One Kannabiran Pillai had two wives. The name of his second wife was Kumudammal with whom he had got married before the advent of The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. As such, she wa..
This is a petition under section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (hereinafter called ‘the Act’). While the petitioner is registered under the Companies Act, 1956, the respondent is a company incorporated in Seoul, South Korea with its p..
Sec 10(3) of the Bihar Land Reforms Fixation of Ceiling Area & Acquisition of Surplus Land Act, 1961 A judgment dismissing the Letters Patent Appeal and confirming the order of the Single Judge has fallen for consideration in this appeal. The lea..
SLP(C) No. 12788 of 2008 was filed by the petitioners namely Shri Vijendra Kumar Verma and Shri Harendra Kumar Ozha. But so far as Shri H.K. Ozha is concerned, on his behalf a prayer was made to withdraw his name from the petition as he was appointed..
One Sarju Singh Kushwaha had two sons, Ram Saran (elder son) and Virendra Kumar Singh Kushwaha (younger son and the first respondent). The appellant, Chanmuniya, was married to Ram Saran and had 2 daughters-Asha, the first one, was born in 1988 and U..
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
