An extremely unusual order passed by the High Court has fallen for consideration in this appeal which has been filed on behalf of the appellant/complainant Virender Prasad Singh. The said order was passed on the basis of a petition filed by the respo..
Facts and circumstances giving rise to this case are that one Chandra Deo Singh was recorded as the khatedar of Khata Nos.485, 620, 146 and 66 of Village Bhojapur and Khata No.21 of Village Kanshari. The respondents in appeal, Rajni Kant and Anjani K..
. Whether by writing editorial, which was published in Excise Law Times dated 1.6.2009 with the title “CESTAT PRESIDENT SETS HOUSE IN ORDER – ANNUAL TRANSFERS FOR MEMBERS INTRODUCED – REGISTRY IN LINE”, the respondent violated the undertaking filed i..
Brief facts which are necessary to dispose of this appeal are recapitulated as under: The Complainant Manisha was married to Kamal Poddar at Kanpur on 10.12.2006. Immediately after the marriage, the complainant who is respondent no.2 in this appeal ..
This appeal has been filed by the two appellants challenging the judgment rendered by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Criminal Appeal No.226-DB of 2002 dated 18.5.2004. By the aforesaid judgment, the High Court has confirmed the judgment of t..
This appeal has been preferred against the Judgment and Order dated 13.02.2009 of the Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh in Criminal Misc. No. 4136 of 2003, wherein the First Information Report (for short, “FIR”) dated 23.07.2002 lodged by the..
Section 6 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 4 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 The Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 3 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 419 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860..
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 125 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 127 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 The Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000..
This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 26.05.2008 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Criminal Petition No.2625 of 2004. Brief facts of the case are as under:- The appellant, who was one of the Directors of R.P..
Brief facts necessary to dispose of this appeal are as under:- On 13.10.2003, a dispute arose between the son of the complainant, namely, Saurav Mahajan, deceased who was a final year student of the Law Department and Harminder Singh, a fellow stude..
This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 27.11.2002 passed by the Madras High Court whereby the High Court reversed the order passed by the Reference Court by reducing the amount of compensation granted by the Reference Court to t..
. The said writ petition was registered as Writ Petition No. 8630 of 2008. Notice of the writ petition having been served on the appellant herein, it took up a plea that the Respondent is not a workman. The said writ petition was disposed of, leaving..
A notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act was published on 09.12.1982, proposing to acquire land of the appellants measuring 2.429 acres covered under Khata No. 581 of Mouza – Bahar Bisinabar for construction of additional buildin..
In the year 2000, the second respondent entered into an agreement with TRW, a manufacturer and supplier of automotive equipments, to provide engineering and IT services. They agreed to sub-contract the automotive engineering works to the second respo..
The question for determination in these Civil Appeals is whether the ‘Voltage Stabilizer’ manufactured and sold by the assessee (respondent herein) ought to be taxed as electrical goods under Entry No. 16 of Schedule to U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 or as..
Facts and circumstances giving rise to the present case are that the appellant was appointed as a Peon in the respondent-Bank, Kaithal Branch, on 01.12.1971 and stood confirmed on the said post vide order dated 28.12.1977. The appellant was handed ov..
This Civil Appeal is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dated 2.4.2002. By the aforesaid order, the Division Bench of the High Court upheld the order of the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir, di..
This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court dated 10.2.2009 in Appeal No.133 of 2002 arising out of Writ Petition No. 2148 of 2001, whereby the Division Bench has held that for the first respond..
In this appeal the judgment and order dated 12.11.2007 of a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka in revisional jurisdiction in H.R.R.P. No. 60 of 2007, under Section 46 (1) of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999 has been impugned...
These appeals filed for setting aside order dated 23.10.2009 passed by the Division Bench of Madras High Court are illustrative of how a defaulting borrower can use the court process for frustrating the action initiated by a bank under the Securitiza..
Member Strength 9,49,266 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
