Adjournment application on non-representation on the date of hearing - whether Adjournment was a matter of right or not? ..
Petitioners, aggrieved by the orders dated 9th July, 2007 passed by the Rajasthan High Court in D.B.Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 623 of 2007 and D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No.421 of 2007 affirming the order dated 18th September, 2006 passed ..
After the death of N. Saya Goud, the properties covered by the Will came into exclusive possession and enjoyment of N. Chandramma and N. Pentamma. Subsequently, the said two beneficiaries of the Will purchased the rights of the Pattadar under an unre..
The State of Uttar Pradesh and its authorities are in appeal before us challenging the correctness of the judgment rendered by a Full Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad whereby and whereunder the High Court held that the restriction a..
This appeal, by special leave, is directed against order dated 11th January, 2010 passed by the High Court of Calcutta in C.R.M. No. 272 of 2010, granting regular bail to respondent No. 1 in this appeal (hereinafter referred to as “the accused"), und..
Challenge in this appeal, by the revenue, under Section 130E(b) of the Customs Act, 1962 (for short “the Act”) is to the order dated 10th December 2004 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, (for short “the Tribunal”) where..
This appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 18th April 2001, delivered by a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Madras, affirming the judgment of a Single Judge of the High Court in W.P. No. 108 of 1998, setting aside Notific..
The short question arising for consideration in this batch of appeals is whether Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short “the NDPS Act”) casts a duty on the empowered officer to ‘inform’ the suspect of his ri..
This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated October 6, 2006 passed by the Allahabad High Court in Government Appeal No.1890/1991 and Criminal Revision No.1140/1991. The High Court, setting aside the judgment of acquittal passed by th..
Being aggrieved by the Judgment delivered in Criminal Appeal No.935 of 2005 and in Criminal Appeal No. 798 of 2006 by the Rajasthan High Court, Criminal Appeal No.705/2008 and Criminal Appeal No.561 of 2008 have been filed respectively. The appellant..
These appeals by the State of U.P. are directed against the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated 7.9.2001 rendered in Criminal Appeal No. 642 of 1988 and Criminal Revision No. 611 of 1988. By the aforesaid judgment, the High Co..
This appeal is directed against the order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short, ‘the National Commission’) whereby the appeal preferred by the respondent under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short, ‘..
This order will dispose of all these criminal appeals filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation against the orders dated 20.7.2010 and 18.08.2010 passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad by which the respondents herein (accused Nos...
Whether the land owners were entitled to enhancement of compensation beyond Rs.200/- per marla determined by the learned Single Judge. The questions arise in the following backdrop. A large extent of land situate in the outskirts of Pathankot in the ..
Brief facts : (a) The Tehsildar, Phagwara, Appellant No.3 herein, filed two eviction petitions under Sections 4 and 7 of the Punjab Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) against Brah..
The prosecution case is that one Jugta Ram, the injured witness in this case, was an employee of one Bheru Singh and was working in his liquor shop. Jugta Ram also lived in the house of Bheru Singh in one room of the upper floor, while the family of ..
The short question in the case is whether a Letters Patent Appeal (for short `LPA’) is maintainable before the Division Bench against the judgment of the learned Single Judge of the High Court. Dated 6.8.2008. Since there was conflict of opinion betw..
The respondent herein filed suit no. 508 of 1983 before the Additional Civil Judge, Allahabad against the appellants for the relief of declaration that she was also one of the owners and co-sharers in the property constituting a house numbering 172, ..
These appeals arise from the decision delivered on 06.08.2004 by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Review Petitions 1071/2003, 1074/2003, and decision of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in WP(C) 63/2002 and WP (C) 1529/2001 dated 03.11.2003. The R..
This appeal by special leave arises out of an order passed by the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi whereby a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. filed by the appellant has been dismissed and an order dated 20th March, 2003 passed in Criminal Revision..
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
