The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal. The present proceeding was started in 1974. It was held that an application u/s 11 before amendment, 1976 is maintainable even after the death of the other party. ..
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal. The essential ceremonies required for the valid marriage under the custom were not performed for the second marriage. ..
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal & gave ex-parte order in absence of respondent. It set aside the decree of judicial separation as no case can be made for mental cruelty on the basis of mere domestic quarrels. ..
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal & upheld the decision of HC in granting divorce. The facts & circumstances provides that mental cruelty has been caused to the husband due to the actions & behavior of the wife. ..
No particular amount for maintenance can be fixed by the Act as the amount may differ from case to case. The Courts have to fix the amount of maintenance considering all the circumstances of both the parties...
In the judgment of the case – Sunil Rathee & others v. The State of Haryana & Others, delivered on July 23, 2020, the Supreme Court has explained two conditions, based on which the Apex-Court can withdraw a case from a High Court to itself, exercisin..
The Supreme Court allowed & dissolved the marriage between the parties. The court opined that there is an irretrievable breakdown of marriage in this case and there is no possibility for both the parties to live together...
The Supreme Court withdrew the petition pending before HC & dissolved the marriage between the parties...
The petition was dismissed as there was no merits in the review petition...
In a well-balanced, well-reasoned, well-analysed and well-worded judgment, a two Judge Bench of the Principal Bench at Jabalpur of Madhya Pradesh High Court comprising of Justice Sanjay Yadav and Justice Atul Sreedharan in its judgment titled In Re..
It has to be stated right at the outset that in a major and significant development, the Bombay High Court in a recent, remarkable and righteous decision titled “Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited Vs Teleone Consumer Product Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.” in ..
In a well-balanced, well-analysed, well-worded and well-reasoned judgment delivered by a woman Judge named Justice Bharati Dangre of the Bombay High Court in a latest, landmark and laudable judgment titled Vaibhav Bhanudas Ubale Vs The State of Mah..
"Section 96 and 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure provide for preferring an appeal from any original decree or from decree in appeal respectively. The aforesaid provisions do not enumerate the categories of persons who can file an appeal. However, i..
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the right of the board to appeal in High Court as the right to appeal was available to the respondent at the time of initiation of the dispute before the amendment which wasn’t preserved thereof...
The Court first clarified the word "property" used in Section 17 and held that it includes properties. The court reiterated that interpretation of word "portion of the property" cannot only be understood in a limited and restrictive sense of being po..
By examining the case, the High Court reversed it’s decision on the judgment which was already given by the Trial Court, stating that the Learned trial court interpreted Section 10 wrongly, as the plaintiff has taken all measures in issuing letters a..
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the decision of the High Court that the civil court didn’t have the territorial jurisdiction to try the said suit...
Delhi High court didn’t have the jurisdiction and the appeal is dismissed...
The court held that the High court should not have shown indulgence of such magnitude by adjourning the matter when the counsel for the appellant was not present. It is difficult to envision why the Court directed fresh notice to the appellant when t..
The High Court set aside the order of the learned single judge. The court observed that the respondent had filed a case seeking permanent injunction so they need to stand on their own instead of discovering the documents about the ownership title of ..
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
