Sahodar Prasad Mahto, Respondent No.1 herein, claiming himself as Vidyut Shramik Leader, filed Writ Petition No. 5067 of 2008 before the High Court of Jharkhand challenging the appointment of Mr. Hari Bansh Lal, the appellant herein (Respondent No.5 ..
The Respondent herein filed an application for eviction of the Petitioner from the premises in question under Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, hereinafter referred to as “the 1949 Act”. Notice of the application was i..
The respondent Bhaskarendu Datta Majumdar joined the services of the State Trading Corporation (hereinafter called “Corporation”) in April 2001 as Executive Secretary to the Chairman-cum-Managing Director of the Corporation and was on the relevant da..
We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the impugned judgments. We see that the High Court and trial court had found that the seven appellants were involved in the incident. The learned counsel for the appellants has, howev..
The learned counsel for the appellant has, first and foremost, pointed out that there was no reason whatsoever to disbelieve PW1 and PW2 as they were eye witnesses to the incident and also the closest relatives of the deceased. It has been further po..
The case of the prosecution was that, Shaminabee, since deceased, was married to one Shaikh Sattar (hereinafter referred to as the appellant) about four years before the fateful incident. Sk. Hasham (hereinafter referred to as A2) was the father-in-l..
These two appeals have been filed against the common judgment of the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam dated 28.6.2004 in Criminal Appeal No. 432 of 2003 and Criminal Appeal No. 873 of 2003 whereby the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the app..
Facts and circumstances giving rise to the present appeal are that Mohd. Qureshi, one of the respondents, lodged a complaint dated 8.11.2005 with Deputy Commissioner of Police, CID (Unit III) against the Arun Gulab Gawali gang. The said complaint was..
This case sadly illustrates how interim orders passed by the court coupled with judicial delays enure to the great advantage of the wrong doer and in the end make him bold in the false belief that with the passage of time the equity was now firmly ..
This is the plaintiff’s appeal arising from a suit for permanent injunction based on allegations of infringement of its registered trade mark. The appellant is a company incorporated and registered under the Companies Act. The case of the appellant i..
In this case, the premium cheque for the insurance policy was received by the appellant, the insurance company, on May 7, 1998 at 4.00 pm and a cover note was issued at the same time. In columns 3 & 4 of the cover note, however, it was stated that th..
Facts and circumstances giving rise to the present cases are that on 7.7.2008, some altercation took place between members of the Bharwad and the Koli Patel communities over the plying of rickshaws in the area surrounding Dhedhal village of Distt. Ah..
All these matters have been filed by the persons aggrieved by the Judgment and order of the High Court of Gujarat dated 22.12.2009 in connected cases. The detailed judgment and order has been passed today i.e. on 26.8.2010 in Criminal Appeal No.1599 ..
Ravi Dutta Singh (2nd appellant) is father of Sukhendra Singh ( 1st appellant). They initiated two separate proceedings under Section 9A (2) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (for short, ‘1953 Act’) against Gaon Sabha, Lakanpur (now Gra..
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 18 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955..
Challenging the preventive detention under COFEPOSA under section 3 (1) COFEPOSA...
"The net of law is spread so wide, No sinner from its sweep may hide. Its meshes are so fine and strong. They take in every child of wrong O wondrous web of mystery !" Big fish alone escape from thee !"..
It hardly needs reiteration that the statutory authorities are duty bound in law to ensure the security and custody of all such properties that may be seized or confiscated till the proceedings under SAFEMA are finally concluded. If it is subseque..
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
