Jai Industries vs N. Babhraiah Acharya And Ors..
Pearlite Liners Ltd. vs Thermo Jarrell Ash Corporation And Anr..
Karnataka Power Transmission Corpn Vs Ashok Iron Works Pvt. Ltd Section 2(1) in The Registration Act, 1908 Section 2(1) in The Companies Act, 1956 Section 2(1)(o) in The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Section 3 in The Registration Act, 1908 S..
Karnataka Power Transmission Corpn Vs Ashok Iron Works Pvt. Ltd Section 2(1) in The Registration Act, 1908 Section 2(1) in The Companies Act, 1956 Section 2(1)(o) in The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Section 3 in The Registration Act, 1908 S..
Appointment of High Court Judge under article 217 of the Constitution of India...
Brief facts which are necessary to dispose of the matter are recapitulated as under: The appellant was enrolled in the Territorial Army on 28.9.1975 as a Sepoy. At the time of joining service the appellant was put through the medical test and was fo..
Under the web of hypertechnicalities justice has taken a back seat as is projected in the order dated 22.11.2006, passed by Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Girgaum, Mumbai in Crl. Case No. 38/S/2005 filed by appellant herein against accused..
The parties were married on May 8, 1995. The respondent-husband petitioned for divorce under Section 13 (1) (ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short, `the Act’) on the ground of cruelty and desertion against the wife. The Principal Ju..
Appellant Mohd. Ayub Dar S/o Abdul Ahad – Original accused no.1 challenges his conviction for the offence punishable under Section 3 (3) of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (In short “TADA ACT”), as also for the offence ..
The Maharshi Dayanand University (hereinafter referred to as “the appellant”) has questioned the correctness of the order in Revision Petition No.132/06 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (hereinafter called “Nat..
“On the 26th of January 1950, India would be a democratic country in the sense that India from that day would have a government of the people, by the people and for the people. The same thought comes to my mind. What would happen to her democratic Co..
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Article 19(1)(a) in The Constitution Of India 1949 Union Of India vs As&Soacnioatthieorn For ... on 2 May, 2002 Shri Dinesh Trivedi, M.P. & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 20 March, 1997..
Freedom Fighter's Pension Scheme, 1972..
The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 The Indian Penal Code, 1860 Article 227 in The Constitution Of India 1949 The Code Of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1956 Section 482 in The Indian Penal Code, 186..
The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 61 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 The Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 482 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 56 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973..
The Manipur Municipalities Act, 1994...
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 M/S. Siemens Ltd.... Appellant vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors.... ... on 1 December, 2006 The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973..
Exceptions 1 and 4 to 5.300 IPC..
Evidence has to be weighed and not counted..
Member Strength 9,48,926 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
