The case is about the accused’s sister having an affair with a man, X and the accused being in disagreement with the affair. Watching the couple spending time together one day, the accused, in the heat of the moment, assaulted X with a knife, thrice ..
The accused, with the intention of killing B, gave him some dessert (Halva) mixed with poison. B ate a portion of halva and threw the rest, which was then picked up by a girl, C who further ate it and gave the rest to another kid. Both the kids died ..
The case was filed before the Sessions Judge of Allahabad by the father (Chauhan) of the kidnapped (Om Prakash) after the death of his son. The son was taken by the two accused Ram Chandra(25 year old man) and Ram Bharosey(49 years old clerk) with th..
"This has to be cleared, or we cannot move further", etched the news papers on fifteenth day of March in 1954. The Dalmia Group owned in the name - Ms Dalmia Jain Airways Ltd had been squared by the investigating agencies, two yrs after it had liquid..
The victim (A minor then) was enticed by the appellant, from near the house where she had gone in order to answer nature’s call, luring her into the idea of marriage. FIR was registered and proceedings in the District and High Court closed in the con..
A landmark judgment in the IP rights field by the Delhi High Court on one of the most famous cases in India whereby, the defendant Akash Arora started providing like webbed services in the name of Yahoo India, which was found to be violative of the T..
The two masters of law, Justice Bhagwati and Justice Desai, ordered the release of a huge number of Under-trials who have been behind the bars for periods more than the maximum period that could be awarded for the crimes they had been charged with. R..
The dawn of the 22nd day of August 2017 witnessed a revolutionary judgement passed by a 5 judges bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court holding the practice of Triple Talaq unconstitutional and violative of the rights of Muslim women, that too for a very..
On 30/10/2017 The District Consumer Forum Warangal passed an interesting judgment in the case CC/4/2017 (Ravichandra. D Vs Samsung Electronics). The DCF Warangal passed the above Judgment directing the Complainant (i.e) Consumer to pay Rs10,000..
The Educational Appellate Tribunal under Karnataka Education Act 1983 in my considered opinion is well within its jurisdiction to declare the terms and condition No 3 in the appointment order as void illegal and unenforceable in an application filed ..
The Hon’ble CESTAT, Chennai held as under: - The Adjudicating Authority had rightly computed the interest amount from the due date till the date of payment in respect of demand for the month of January, 2011, by working out interest at 13% up to M..
The Hon’ble CESTAT, Bangalore held that although there is no specific 'relevant date' under Section 11B of the Excise Act to claimrefund of unutilized credit, but, that would not rule out applicability of Section 11B. Relevant date should be the date..
Hon’ble Apex Court held that it cannot be the intention of the Legislature to provide rebate only on one item i.e. either on inputs or final products. It was further held that giving such restrictive meaning to Rule 18 of the Excise Rules would not o..
The Hon’ble CESTAT, Mumbai held that reimbursement of the cost of obtaining and employing resources/certain expenses incurred by the Appellant on the behalf of the Group Companies cannot be regarded as consideration flowing to the Appellant towards t..
The Hon’ble AAR, after detailed discussion, held that: The phrase 'grant of license to use the system on a non-exclusive basis' is used for the reason that the proprietary/intellectual property used in the system is utilized by the Applicant in othe..
The Hon’ble High Court of Patna held as under: The ‘Governmental authority’ as defined in the Notification dated January 30, 2014, means an authority or a board or any other body set up by an Act of Parliament or State Legislature;..
We are of the opinion that the judgment of the High Court has not discussed and decided the issue correctly and warrants interference. We, thus, allow these appeals and set aside the judgment of the High Court by holding that Sodexo Meal Vouchers are..
The collegium system of judicial appointments is here to stay. The Supreme Court today declared the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC), and the Constitutional amendments involved, to be in violation of the Constitution of India...
The petitioner has to be paid all the increments and quarterly allowances which he would have been entitled if he was not under suspension from the date of his suspension in addition to the amount already paid to him by the clause has been correctly ..
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
