ML Sharma (Advocate) 04 March 2012

Vodafone pil

Hello Members..,

This is about Vodafone PIL Case before Supreme Court filed on 22nd Feburary, dismissed WITHOUT hearing on 2nd March..

THIS IS A CORRUPTION BY VODAFONE via law firm having CJI Sons..

If judge have relative with the law firm of a party , he should not here the matter. There is 100% possibility to favour the related party. Therefore, 27 Judges of supreme court decided in 1997 issued the direction as a code of conduct. But declined by the CJI to follow it in Vodafone Matter. He concealed this fact. He admitted that Hosnar Kapadia is his son but any how succeed to dismissed the PIL but question remain unanswered that why he did not disclosed his relation with Vodafone Case via his son.

CJI's Son-in-law Jahageer Press working with Tata Group. CJI heard TATA Industries appeal without disclosing this fact. Upon asking by the me (the petitioner). CJI replied through registrar that his son-in-law is working with India Hotels Ltd. CJI concealed the fact that India Hotels Ltd. belongs to only TATA Group. WHY..????

Whether writ petition (PIL) disclosed fraud by Vodafone upon India and upon Supreme Court/High Court is liable to say a frivolous act..??

IS IT NOT CORRUPTION..?? Is is not conflict of interest..??

Conflict of Interest, how..?? Son is working with E&Y who represent and help in entire case on behalf of Vodafone.. It is irrelevant when he join E&Y. Relevant point is that appeal was heard and decided when he is with the law firm and naturally Vodafone took his help, which is clearly shows CONFLICT OF INTEREST...

Law Firms are mushrooming in India who is securing Judicial Orders from all courts (including High Court and Supreme Court) for their rich and corporate clients with the help of Judges Kith and Kin & their friends, relatives, engaging them as employee in the Firm or as a legal advisor to the firm, paying crores of the rupees as their fees.

These Law Firms also engage resource full advocates having direct link with judges and their kith & kin and paying them more then crores as fees for securing favorable orders as happened in Vodafone Case. (It is told that Mr. Salve appeared for Vodafone has been paid more than hundred crores as fees and CJI's son Hoshnar Kapdia belongs to the Law Firm who has been advising Vodafone and to Mr. Salve in the case in Supreme Court).

When I, ML Sharma Advocate, found serious fraud upon Govt. of India, holding 100% FDI in telecom sector contra to the FEMA which permitted FDI upto 49%, and other fraud in judicial proceeding, RBI, Ministry of Finance for securing judicial order and FIPB and RBI Permission, filed Writ Petition (PIL) in the Supreme Court with only prayer to cancel their license, FIPB and RBI permission of 2004 and CBI Enquiry, due to Vodafone/Mr. Salve/CJI's personal interest, Supreme Court Bench Aftab Alam and Ranjana Desai, fired upon me, the petitioner advocate, stating that I can not challenge Supreme Court Order to get it quash in writ proceeding, it is a scandalous and frivolous petition, therefore, liable to be dismiss and dismissed it with cost Rs. 50,000/-.

I am enclosing herewith PIL Admission of CJI that Hoshnar Kapadia work with Law Firm, but he did not disclosed that about his son involvement.

Now, yourself decide whether, the petition is frivolous of this is JUDICIAL CORRUPTION/TERRORISM..??

Reply your comments to supreme court of India at supremecourt@nic.in and to President of India at presidentofindia@RB.nic.in to upheld code of conduct for Judges and to prove their miss-behavior as like a CITIZEN of INDIA.

Find here files, for your reference.., and evaluate yourself, what’s going on in judiciary..

Vodafone PIL

https://www.scribd.com/doc/83597358/Vodafone-PIL

decide yourself, what is frivolous in this petition..??????

Letter by CJI

https://www.scribd.com/doc/83591142/CJI-Letter-Dt-21-2-2012

Code of Ethics for Judges by Full Court of Supreme Court (27 Judges)

https://www.scribd.com/doc/83597892/Code-of-Ethics-for-Judges-Supreme-Court-Resolution-by-Full-Court-of-27-Judges (Page 31)

Regards

M. L. Sharma Advocate

Petitioner in Person.

Reply Follow

1 Replies

Democratic Indian (n/a) 04 March 2012

Sir what you have highlighted does not surprise me. I will go through the details after sometime. But I would like to say that when there is no fear of punishment to those in power, they are bound to misuse it. The entire colonial government structure including judiciary were created to extract wealth from this country without providing any real justice. They were not made to provide good and humble governess with justice. It is not surprising why everything about a system that was created to protect corruption has been kept intact and Constitution is silent on this aspect. Rather Article 311 protects it.

There are many judgments where Supreme Court "erred". A famous one being the Additional District Magistrate Jabalpur Vs. Shivakant Shukla case (1976) during Emergency. The bench had given judgment in the 4:1 ruling. The only dissenting opinion was from Justice H. R. Khanna, who stated "detention without trial is an anathema to all those who love personal liberty... A dissent is an appeal to the brooding spirit of the law, to the intelligence of a future day, when a later decision may possibly correct the error into which the dissenting Judge believes the court to have been betrayed."

It is believed that before delivering his dissenting opinion, Justice Khanna had mentioned to his sister "I have prepared my judgment, which is going to cost me the Chief Justice-ship of India." Result for giving a dissenting judgment in support of truth and justice cost him his promotion as predicted. Justice Khanna was superseded despite being the most senior judge at the time. How many judges have this courage to stand by truth and justice? Probably now you can get an idea about the forces of vested interests working behind the scene that may sometimes influence judgments. After many decades when those forces were absent, this same judgment was "corrected" by Supreme Court, you may read about it at https://indialawyers.wordpress.com/2011/01/02/supreme-court-admits-it-violated-fundamental-rights-during-emergency/

Similar discussion was done sometime ago at https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Myopia-of-sc-judges-45966.asp