A advocate keeps sending notices for the client and claims 5k charges from opponent for such notice? Is it legal and where to lodge complains? TIA
Rama chary Rachakonda (Secunderabad/Telangana state Highcourt practice watsapp no.9989324294 ) 01 September 2025
Generally, advocates can charge clients for services rendered, including sending notices.
However, claiming charges directly from the opponent might not be standard practice unless specified by law or agreed upon by the parties involved.
Potential Misconduct If the advocate is sending unnecessary notices or threatening the opponent with inflated charges, it could be considered misconduct.
Examples of misconduct include: -
*Professional Misconduct*: Any act or behavior that violates professional ethics to achieve selfish goals. -
*Overcharging*: Demanding excessive fees for services. -
*Harassment*: Using legal processes to intimidate or coerce others.
Where to Lodge Complaints If you believe the advocate's actions constitute misconduct, you can file a complaint with-
*State Bar Council*: The council regulates the conduct of advocates in their respective states. You can file a complaint in the form of a petition, specifying the advocate's details and the nature of the complaint. -
*Bar Council of India*: If the state bar council's decision is unsatisfactory, you can appeal to the Bar Council of India within 60 days of the order.
Procedure for Filing a Complaint To file a complaint, follow these steps:
1. *Prepare a Petition*: Draft a petition detailing the advocate's misconduct, including dates, actions, and evidence.
2. *Submit the Complaint*: File the complaint with the state bar council, along with supporting documents and fees, if applicable.
3. *Await Investigation*: The council will investigate the matter and may request additional information or evidence.
Additional Considerations -
*Civil or Criminal Action*: Depending on the nature of the complaint, you might also consider pursuing civil or criminal action against the advocate. -
kavksatyanarayana (subregistrar/supdt.(retired)) 01 September 2025
An advocate cannot claim fees from the opposing party as he was not engaged by the opposing party. You can complain to the Bar Council of the state.
Advocate Bhartesh goyal (advocate) 01 September 2025
Issuing notice by an Advocate on behalf and instructions of his client to opposite party does not amounts any threat nor demanding notice charges on behalf of his clients comes under purview of professional misconduct .Act of Advocate is perectly legal.
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate) 02 September 2025
Sending a legal notice to an opponent's party to demand your own unpaid fees is unprofessional and can be considered professional misconduct under the Advocates Act, 1961, as it is seen as abusing the legal process for personal financial gain.
Lawyers are expected to maintain trust and avoid using the legal system to pressure clients or other parties for money, which undermines public faith in the judiciary.
There is a risk that such practices can be used to exploit vulnerable individuals, a concern highlighted by the Supreme Court in the context of motor accident compensation cases.
Clients can file complaints for such misconduct with the appropriate Bar Council, which can take disciplinary action under Section 35 of the Advocates Act.
R.K Nanda (Advocate) 02 September 2025
I fully agree with the reply of expert Shri.Bhartesh Goyal.
Advocate Bhartesh goyal (advocate) 02 September 2025
Thanks Nanda Sahib.
Dr. J C Vashista (Advocate ) 04 September 2025
I too agree with learned senior experts S/Sh.. Bhartesh Goyal and R K Nanda ji.
P. Venu (Advocate) 04 September 2025
Is this not a case of much ado about nothing?
A Advocate Notice is of legal consequence, unless it is issued under a statutory mndate for instance, that under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
And it is the prevailing practice to mention of a certain amount as fee for the said Natice. However, this is a mere bald statement, being not legally enforceable unless awarded by a competent court in the due process of law.
Viewing such inane correspondence as "threatening" is visulalising ghosts where none exits.