LCI Learning
New LIVE Course: Toxicology and Law. Batch begins 21st July. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More


(Guest)

Sc says;right of wife to receive maintenance u/s 125 is not

 

SC says;Right of wife to receive maintenance u/s 125 is not curtailed by S.125(3)

 
A reading of the order dated 21.4.2004 passed by the 
High Court would go to show that the proviso to Section 
125(3) CrPC has been construed by the High Court to be a 
fetter on the entitlement of the claimants to receive arrears 
of maintenance beyond a period of one year preceding the 
date of filing of the application under Section 125(3) CrPC. 
Having considered the said provision of the Code we do not 
find that the same creates a bar or in any way effects the 
entitlement of a claimant to arrears of maintenance. What 
the proviso contemplates is that the procedure for recovery 
of maintenance under Section 125(3) CrPC, namely, by 
construing the same to be a levy of a fine and the detention 
of the defaulter in custody would not be available to a 
claimant who had slept over his/her rights and has not 
of the defaulter in custody would not be available to a 
claimant who had slept over his/her rights and has not 
approached the Court within a period of one year 
commencing from the date on which the entitlement to 
receive maintenance has accrued. However, in such a 


 0 Replies


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register