Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Siv (engineer)     11 November 2011

Right jurisdiction to file case u/s 167 & 218 ipc

Hi All,

 

 

Please reply me about the jurisdiction of the criminal case in the below circumstances:

 

 

Complaint made to Police and FIR is registred. Police investigated the case and recorded CrPC-161 statements. While preparing the charge sheet/final report police changed the version of the law witnesses and prepared the final report in contrary to the CrPC-161 statements of law witnesses. The final report says the complaint is flase and also some persons from another state (Bombay) involved in forcing the the false complaint (in Karnataka) by the complainant.

 

 

It is clear that police officer misled the court by preparing the fasle information as part of the final report/charge sheet and commited an offence U/s 167 and 218 of IPC.

 

 

To register the case U/s 167 and 218 of IPC by the person living in another state (allegedly forced to make complaint by the complainant as per police) which place has the jurisdiction....?

 

 

can the person who is allegedly involved in forcing the complianant to file the complaint file the case agains the police at his local court (In karnataka) in his state. Can the person invoke section 179 of CrPC to invoke jurisdiction of court in Karnataka.....



Learning

 6 Replies

Nadeem Qureshi (Advocate/ nadeemqureshi1@gmail.com)     11 November 2011

Dear Siv

read this

197. Prosecution of Judges and public servants.

 

(1) When any person who is or was a Judge or Magistrate or a public servant not removable from his office save by or with the sanction of the Government is accused of any offence alleged to have been committed by him while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty no court shall take cognizance of such offence except with the previous sanction-

 

(a) In the case of it person who is employed or, as the case may be, was at the time of commission of the alleged offence employed, in connection with the affairs of the Union, of the Central Government;

 

(b) In the case of a person who is employed or, as the case may be, was at the time of commission of the alleged offence employed, in connection with the affairs of a State, of the State Government:

 

1[Provided that where the alleged offence was committed by a person referred to in clause (b) during the period while a Proclamation issued under clause (1) of article 356 of the Constitution was in force in a State, clause (b) will apply as if for the expression "State Government" occurring therein, the expression "Central Government" were substituted.

 

(2) No Court shall take cognizance of any offence alleged to have been committed by any member of the Armed Forces of the Union whole acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty, except with the previous sanction of the Central Government.

 

(3) The State Government may, by notification, direct that the provisions of subsection (2) shall apply to such class or category of the members of the Forces charged with the maintenance of public order as may be specified therein, whenever they may be serving, and thereupon the provisions of that sub-section will apply as if lot the expression "Central Government" occurring therein, the expression "State Government were substituted.

 

2[(3A) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (3), no court shall take cognizance of any offence, alleged to have been committed by any member of the Forces charged with the maintenance of public order in a State while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty during the period while a Proclamation issued trader clause (I) of article 356 of the Constitution was in force therein, except with the previous sanction of the Central Government.

 

(3B) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Code or any other law, it is here by declared that any sanction accorded by the State Government or any cognizance taken by a court upon such sanction, during the period commencing on the 20th day of August, 1991 and ending with the date immediately preceding the date on which the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1991, receives the assent of the President, with respect to an offence alleged to have been committed during the period while a Proclamation issued under clause (1) of article 356 of the Constitution was in force in the State, shall be invalid and it shall be competent for the Central Government in such matter to accord sanction and for the court to take cognizance thereon.]

 

(4) The Central Government or the State Government, as the case may be, may determine the person by whom, the manner in which, and the offence or offences for which, the prosecution of such Judge, Magistrate or public servant is to be conducted, and may specify the court before which the trial is to be held.

 

1. Added by Act 43 of 1991, sec. 2 (w.e.f. 2-5-1991)

 

2. Ins. by Act 43 of 1991, sec. 2 (w.e.f. 2-5-1991)

 

STATE AMENDMENTS

 

Assam:

 

For sub-section (3) of section 197, the following subsection shall be submitted, namely.

 

"(3) The State Government may, by notification, direct that the provisions of' subsection (2) shall apply.

 

(a) To such class or category of the members of' the Forces charged with the maintenance of' public order, or

 

(b) To such class or category of other public servants [not being persons to whom the provisions of sub-section (1) or subsection (2) apply] charged with the maintenance of public order.

 

As may be specified in the notification wherever they may be serving, and thereupon the provisions of sub-section (2) shall apply as if' for the expression Central Government occurring therein, the expression State Government were substituted."

 

[Vide President's Act 3 of 1980. (w.e.f. 5-6-1980)].

 

Maharashtra:

 

After section 197, the following section shall be inserted namely.

 

"197A. Prosecution of commissioner of Receiver appointed by civil court.- When any person who is a Commissioner or Receiver appointed by a court under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is accused of any offence alleged to have committed by him while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his functions as Commissioner or Receiver, no court shall take cognizance of such offence except with the previous sanction of the court, which appointed such person as Commissioner or Receiver, as the case may, be."

 

[Vide Maharashtra act 60 of 1981, sec. 2 (w.e.f 5-10-1981)]

 

Shonee Kapoor (Legal Evangelist - TRIPAKSHA)     11 November 2011

Siv My brother.

 

You are expanding your energies without much headway.

 

 

Regards,
 
Shonee Kapoor
harassed.by.498a@gmail.com

Rajeev Kumar (Lawyer/Advocate)     11 November 2011

Nadeem has rightly answered and i do agree

Siv (engineer)     11 November 2011

Shonee Ji,

 

Please clarify your statement.

 

 

Am I doing wrong?

 

 

Please advice me ...

Siv (engineer)     11 November 2011

Dear All,

 

 

From which officer need to get permission to prosecute police officer?

 

If no reply is recived from the sanctioning authority to prosecute police officer, how many days need to wait and what to do after completion of waiting period?

 

 

If no reply recived from the sanctioning authority to prosecute police officer, shall we go ahed with the private complaint before Magistrate...

Shonee Kapoor (Legal Evangelist - TRIPAKSHA)     11 November 2011

The permission has to be granted by Secretary, Ministry of Home Department.

 

 

Regards,
 
Shonee Kapoor
harassed.by.498a@gmail.com
 
PS: It is a waste of time as per my limited knowledge, as they would not do anything unless you are proven innocent. But you foot the bill, so you are free to roam around.

Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register