Forget about freedom: SC to husbands

consultant

Forget about freedom: SC to husbands – Marry to be slaved by wife and her parents- husbands to become pet doggy

11 Jun, 2010, 02.53AM IST,IANS NEW DELHI: Married men should forget about their freedom after they tie the nuptial knot as restrictions on their independence are like “dividends” they have to pay for matrimony, the Supreme Court said on Thursday in a divorce suit. “Whenever a person is married, there is no question of independence,” Justice Deepak Verma said, hearing a divorce suit between Colonel Ajit Sharma (name changed) and his estranged wife and software professional Seema Sharma (name changed). By making the observations, the court revisited the remarks of the vacation bench of Justice Markandey Katju and Justice Verma of 2009 wherein it had said: “Do what the wife tells you and never question her authority.” Justice Katju had said: “If men want to rule their life then they should always be on the right side of their wife. Otherwise, a defiant husband’s life would be ruled by others.” He said that if the “wife says turn right, turn right and if she says turn left, then turn left”. On Thursday, the observation about husbands surrendering their independence came when the court was told that Seema had wished “happy Independence Day” to her husband when both of them filed a divorce suit by mutual consent. The bench of Justice Verma and Justice K S Radhakrishnan was hearing an appeal filed by Ajit seeking divorce from his wife. They have a 14-year-old daughter Priyanka (name changed) studying at a boarding school in Dehradun. Initially, the court said: “We are not made to break up marriages.” Thereafter, the court counselled the couple to go for reconciliation. The two were told by the court that for them, the welfare and the future of their child should be the top priority. However, soon realising that the couple could not live peacefully under one roof, the court worked out a package that could mitigate the difficulties of the mother who was to bring up Priyanka after separation. The court asked Ajit to suggest a package that he was willing to offer his estranged wife so that she could bear the expenses of bringing up their daughter. The court said that the package should factor in inflation, price rise and the cost of child’s education, her marriage and other needs. It gave Ajit time to think over it. When SC resumed hearing, Seema was told that besides Ajit bearing entire expenses of Priyanka’s education till senior secondary, he would pay her Rs 4 lakh and give a 250 square metre plot in Secunderabad in Andhra Pradesh. Ajit said she could dispose the house to mop up more money. The package was in addition to the Rs 1.50 lakh that has already been given to Seema by him. An insurance policy of Rs 5 lakh in the name of their daughter has also been given to her. After a second adjournment, Seema told SC that she wanted a plot of land in Delhi or Gurgaon and demanded an arrangement for their daughter’s education after school. http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/Forget-about-freedom-SC-to-husbands/articleshow/6034997.cms


Total likes : 1 times

 
Reply   
 

Justice Katju had said: “If men want to rule their life then they should always be on the right side of their wife. Otherwise, a defiant husband’s life would be ruled by others.”  He has mentioned nothing surprising, by others he means the mother or sisters of husband. So choice is his, by whom he wants to be ruled. Same is true for the girl, if she does not allow her husband to rule her, she will play in hands of others and be ruled by her parents, relatives etc. So why not happpily rule and pleasently each other and enjoy life?:)  Were is the problem?

"From woman, man is born; within woman, man is conceived; to woman he is engaged and married.  Woman becomes his friend; through woman, the future generations come.  When his woman dies, he seeks another woman; to woman he is bound.  So why call her bad? From her, kings are born.  From woman, woman is born; without woman, there would be no one at all.Guru Nanak, Raag Aasaa Mehal 1, Page 473


Total likes : 2 times

 
Reply   
 


consultant

GURU NANAK JI HAD NOT SEEN FAKE 498A WOMEN

 
Reply   
 
Retired Reader

Is right to life and liberty of husbands guaranteed u/a 21 of the constitution is scrapped by SC?

 
Reply   
 
consultant

IT IS UNder pretext of 51e and 243 G (eleventh schedule so called 20 sutri karyakram of congress) And 15(3) power of State to make special provision for—backward classes, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
women and children that these laws were created to be misused by progressive urban women. in villages women are still maltreated and in urban areas women legally rape men thru these biased laws. there need to be a borderline where these laws shud be applicable.

 
Reply   
 
EYVR

 b4 marriage ,if men keep scrutinizing girls' families b4 before marriage to know if they will host the marriage in a baraat ghar or in a hotel,in a temple or in a farmhouse,in a banquet hall or in a tent,,men will end up marrying wrong women

if while finding a suitable match for themselves, men give priority to extreme beauty and fairness in a girl,they will end up marrying wrong women 

if while finding a suitable match for themselves, men allow their parents to scrutinize how good dowry her parents can give, ,they will end up marrying wrong women 

on the other hand,if they look for good qualities ONLY instead of her financial status,they will be saved from harassment of cunning women whom they ended up marrying.....

they shud verify before marriage the girl's character,her nature,her family members' nature etc....thru neighbours,workplace of her/her family members,etc instead of screening and finally interacting with only those girls  b4 marriage who have a good financial standing

 

Look at the matrimonial ads for seeking brides.........u will know that grooms use statements like want girl from status family,similar status family(if groom is rich),decent marriage expected, only families of v.fair and extremely beautiful girls may respond,etc,etc, etc....

at the time of screening girls b4 marriage,they make a big mistake of leaving out all those girls who have real attributes just becoz they may be orphaned,whose father is no more,who use statements like DOWRY SEEKERS EXCUSE OR SIMPLE MARRIAGE).... becoz they are unable to host a good marriage.

And in the end they are left with very few choices and end up marrying a wrong person who may act too smart becoz she paid a hefty dowry(here i m not saying that all gals who give good dowry misbehave)

.

they shud remember all that glttiers is not gold........... foolishness ends up in misery........

dats y our elders have always focussed on sansakaari family while choosing a match.....but we  no more pay heed to such sacred advice now...as we want booty alongwith the bride

PERIOD

 

our only consideration shud be:

girl's education

girl's profession(if the boy desires so)

her attributes & temparament

family's moral values.

matching of kundlis by a GOOD astrologer(kundlis give a v.good idea about the prospective spouse's temperament..........whether u believe or not,provided u have appointed an expert astrologer for the same)

 

 

PS.-I'm also a woman,so obviously i m not saying all women are cunning....my advice is only that only the girls's qualities shud be main consideration


Total likes : 1 times

 
Reply   
 
law officer

The breed of jogeshwar, who are talking about Article 21 have forgotten those human rights available to wife when she enters into the matrimonial home.  Recently an  advertisement is coming on T.V.  When brother in law, a small boy runs behind the car which is carrying his jijju and didi,  worrying about his sister's safety.  When jijju shows his baritone voice by daunting brother-in-law saying - "Khulke bole Chotu".  The boy eats some chocolate and changes as the famous vijender singh, the boxer and showing his gloves, says - "Jijju, dil pe hat rakh ke, muh pe smile chipkake bol - didi ko khush rakhega".  The sister smiles cheerfully and says "Aate rehna bhayya".  That advertisement shows real picture of the plight of women in matrimonial home.  Every errant husband needs Vijender Singh type of brother -in- law to keep them in track and to understand human rights.


Total likes : 1 times

 
Reply   
 
UNEMPLOYED

Is right to life and liberty of husbands guaranteed u/a 21 of the constitution is scrapped by SC?

WHY NOT ?

right to life and liberty of husbands guaranteed u/a 21, COI.

 
Reply   
 
UNEMPLOYED

MS. HEMA,

SURPRISING, HERE ALSO YOU ATTACKED MR JOGESHWAR!

THIS IS NOT AN ENTERTAINMENT CHANNEL. DISCUSSION ON A TV SERIAL OR ADVERTISEMENT SHOULD BE AVOIDED HERE.

QUITE UNNECESSARILY SOME MEMBERS DISTURBING THIS FAMILY LAW SECTION. BETTER POSTING YOUR MATTER IN 'OTHERS' SECTION.

 
Reply   
 
law officer

@arup

I was reading the forum postings of all forums including the family law forum.  this was the most polluted forum.  this is the forum where women are degarded, abused and heckled.  read the civil law forum positings and criminal law forum postings.  advocates and legal law experts give replies there.  there every thing and every one is courteous.  here, every quack is giving replies abusing women.  one year back, several advocates were replying to the questions in legal manner on this forum.  now, only two or three advocates are answering the questions. only copy paste people like you left in this forum. 

 
Reply   
 

LEAVE A REPLY


    

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  



 

  Search Forum








×

Menu

Post a Suggestion for LCI Team
Post a Legal Query
CrPC MASTERCLASS!     |    x