Greetings all eminent lawyers,
Brief History :- Case of overbilling .in a Mumbai CHS
There were 4 points of overbilling namely
Commercial charges on a dental clinic (Issue of law) and three other gross overbilling points ( Issues of facts )
Finally I filed a case in co-operative court u/s 91 of MCS act. However the lawyer at that time did not mention all the points of overbilling in the prayers and he described them incompletely in the pleadings.
Later on my new advocate said that prayers need to be specific and finely chiseled so that at the end of litigation I get justice.
Therefore we asked for an amendment in prayers. We only detailed the overbilling in the prayers. The trial court and appellate court rejected it on the grounds that conditions have not changed after the case was filed.
My concern is that if prayers are not specific I may not get justice and years of litigation may go to waste if the prayers are not specific ?
Should I suffer because the 1st lawyer did not draft and detail the prayers properly?
Please let me know what are my legal options ?
Hope to see many responses and many thanks in advance for the same.
Regards,
Dr. Veerendra Darakh.
