Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Raj Kumar Makkad (Adv P & H High Court Chandigarh)     27 January 2011

NOT BACK IN THE BLACK

NOT BACK IN THE BLACK It's not clear if the Supreme Court will be satisfied with finance minister Pranab Mukherjee's explanation as to why the government cannot reveal the names of Indians who have money stashed away in Swiss banks—Tuesday's press conference was called in response to the Court giving the government a mouthful on the subject. The government told the Court international treaties forbade it from revealing the names.

 

At Tuesday's press meet, the FM detailed what the government had done in the matter. It had initiated the process of negotiations with 65 countries so that India could get details of banking transactions; 8 more income tax units had been set up overseas; taxmen working on transfer pricing had been trained better—within a short period, the FM said, adjustments worth Rs 45,000 crore had been made in import and export transactions, and Rs 33,800 crore of additional taxes collected. Some of this shows new determination and some looked like the old stuff being trotted out again—the best example of the latter, of course, is the setting up of a new multi-disciplinary committee to estimate the size of the black economy and the addition to it each year. Instead of just taking the government's word that it is going to get at the black money, let's examine its record. As compared to its projected tax collections of Rs 7,47,000 crore in 2010-11, tax arrears add up to Rs 1,17,000 crore.

 

These are amounts owed by persons the government knows the names of, and none of them are protected by any tax treaty; these are amounts where the income tax demand has already been raised; Rs 46,000 crore of this is not even under any form of dispute; around Rs 29,000 crore has been due for more than 5 years. Or take the celebrated VDIS amnesty scheme in 1997—as against the 35% tax to be paid, enough loopholes were left to allow people to pay 5-10% tax and get away, but no action ever got taken against officials who allowed this; Lalu Prasad and Mayawati were prosecuted for their black money but the cases never moved forward. In the latest 2G scam, if there is no revenue loss, as the government says, the case has lost much of its sting. Mauritius has long been seen as an entry point for India's black money to come back tax-free, but little has been done about it all these years …

Why are we so focused only on money stashed abroad?



Learning

 2 Replies

N.K.Assumi (Advocate)     28 January 2011

International treaties forbade it from revealing the names: "Why are we so focused only on money stashed aboard"? I am shock to hear such statements from the mouth of our Finance Minister shri.Pranab Mukherjee, a person whom I have deep respect. International treaties or Conventions that usurped the wealth of a Nation amounting to crimes against the whole Indian humanity must be respected though it goes against its own Mother laws: OK, let it be for the time being. We are watching this development with keen interest and the reaction of the Supreme Court, and Raj Sir.please keep on up dating this issues in the forum. Once again thank you very much indeed for posting this important informations.

N.K.Assumi (Advocate)     28 January 2011

In Nagaland the Nagas are very serious over this issues, as once the Govt.of India revealed the names we would rushed where ever they are to invite them to Grace some great events as Chief Guest.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register