- What you mentioned in points 1 to 4 is correct. Most of the lawyers use these tactics to earn money. Since Nov 93 I am fighting for a divorce case. My experience is almost similar.
Reg point 5, I feel lawyers and judges not ignorant about the said point, but might be they try to full their client/ party.
- " NONE of them is honest." - It is wrong impression. Many of them of them may dishonest. But I experienced, few of them are honest also.
Yes money transaction might be there, as the whole thing happened under curtain, it is absolutely impossible to bring these in daylight.
What anna and mr prasant bhushan says are correct. Heavy corruption is there. Now system is so worst that people automatically believe, without going through the merits of the
charges. Honest lawyers and judges suffer for it.
"they were completely unaware of this thing" - in some cases it is true.
"'jugaad' or 'setting' which they do. " a very common fact in legal field.
"Are aisa nahi hota hai"
"humko kaanoon mat sikhao"
"Aisa hi hai to aap apna case khud hi lad lo"
All these are due to receive full payment from you. Now his strategy is to get rid from the client. If you pay day to day basis they will be very carefull to you.
"apna case khud lad lo" - yes, I am one of them. The reason is, as you mentoioned.
"In cases when the case get spoiled start blaming the legal fretanity." - When the person fights for his own, how legal fretarnity responsible for it? Simply an imagination.
" That's why we are not developing and they are" -please do not say in this manner. That may huet many. You may have genuine complains. Problem is in general. We have to find legal and logical solutions of it.
"I give them 1/3rd of the fee for the drafting, 1/3rd upon notices sent and 1/3rd upon final arguments" - a govt system is there. They pay part by part. We should follow it.
"cultural re-orientation required so that people's self respect and dignity are recognized by these service providers" - yes this job should be done by one another anna.
"Most judges never wanted to hear from parties" - wrong impression. They are bound to hear and normally they hear.
" In criminal court they mostly do not allow citizens to have a seat there while they let lawyers go in and out even if they have no cases with that court" - wrong impression. In India civil and criminal courts are open court. General public allowed to seat there to here the proceedings. On petition of any party, provision of secret hearing is there. That is called 'in camera'. There nobody allowed except the pleaders of the parties.
" But you do not want to pay his expanses and fees which will natuarlly be more. So you choose a novice and these problems occur." - these are not facts. Costly lawyers also do the professional misbehaviours as alleged. My practical experience is that, some novice lawyers give better result, if they get chance.
" they still want to loot" - yes true. But not are equally greedy.
" you want good advocate but do not want to pay than create minor minor hassales" - mr jsdn has no other logic.
"credit card system also acts as proof" - yes true. In india a/c payee cheque may use for it.
" THIS IS CLEARLY DONE TO EVADE TAX. WHY ARE YOU NOT REPLYING TO THAT" - true. It helps in two ways, one is generation of black money and also, no record of receiving money to the client, which deprive client to raise further dispute against the pleader.
"3. Legally literate and Capable but don't have time to spare since the judicial system has no respect for citizen's time " very perfect. Many of us suffer due to these loop wholes.
" legal citizen" - what is this? The legal term is 'in person' - who represent himself or herself at court.