No CIC has ordered in my favour. This is tax evasion case for money spent by father in law and jewelry given to wife in 498A /406 case
"Appellant has stated that he had submitted TEP over one year ago. In the interest of transparency and good
governance, it is expected that the Department will not unduly delay the process of enquiry. Therefore it is directed that after concluding the enquiry as expeditiously as possible, the Department will provide information to the
appellant about the outcome regarding whether the facts provided by him in his TEP were found to be true/partially true/false.
A) The information is not time barred but says " as expeditiously as possible".
B) I need to view the statements given by father in law and wife at Income Tax dept. which might be contradictory to avoid the tax by them . This will help in my 498a/ 406 rebuttal. Any way out????